How did a fight between #2 and #7 at HW turn in to a rematch between #1 and #2?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Robbie Barrett
    Banned
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Nov 2013
    • 40891
    • 2,779
    • 667
    • 570,921

    #1

    How did a fight between #2 and #7 at HW turn in to a rematch between #1 and #2?

    If you think about it it's a ****ing joke. #2 fighter robs #7 now they're #1 and #2 how does that work? They've done **** all.

    Fury has fought nobody but bums.
    Wilder rematched a 50 year old.

    They've fought only 1 of the other top 10 between them.

    Fury was robbed so you can understand him being highly ranked, but Wilder? Wilder is still benefiting from the robbery, he shouldn't be so highly ranked.
    Last edited by Robbie Barrett; 02-12-2020, 05:41 AM.
  • Fists_of_Fury
    Banned
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Feb 2006
    • 7366
    • 2,351
    • 12,608
    • 58,085

    #2
    All the Heavyweights atm suck. The top guys now would be journeyman in other eras. Joshua got sparked by a fat Mexican lol... no wonder he's not 1 or 2.

    Comment

    • Robbie Barrett
      Banned
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Nov 2013
      • 40891
      • 2,779
      • 667
      • 570,921

      #3
      Originally posted by Fists_of_Fury
      All the Heavyweights atm suck. The top guys now would be journeyman in other eras. Joshua got sparked by a fat Mexican lol... no wonder he's not 1 or 2.
      That fat Mexican beat the #1 fighter and became #1, Joshua beat him in a rematch. So both Joshua and Ruiz beat #1 ranked fighters, but two guys that haven't (Fury's win before being banned for peds doesn't count) are #1 and #2?

      Wilder and Fury 1 and 2 doesn't make sense.

      Comment

      • removed
        Undisputed Champion
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Nov 2008
        • 21479
        • 4,005
        • 831
        • 164,542

        #4
        If Joshua hadn't got knocked out by a fat, useless bum, he would be #1 or #2. No need to get butthurt about it.

        Comment

        • Robbie Barrett
          Banned
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Nov 2013
          • 40891
          • 2,779
          • 667
          • 570,921

          #5
          Originally posted by denium
          If Joshua hadn't got knocked out by a fat, useless bum, he would be #1 or #2. No need to get butthurt about it.
          That fat bum beat the #1 became #1 and Joshua beat him. That means both have better wins than the so called #1 and #2. Wilder lost to Fury why is he #1?
          Last edited by Robbie Barrett; 02-12-2020, 07:13 AM.

          Comment

          • removed
            Undisputed Champion
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Nov 2008
            • 21479
            • 4,005
            • 831
            • 164,542

            #6
            Originally posted by Robbie Barrett
            That fat bum beat the #1 became #1 and Joshua beat him. That means both have better wins than the so called #1 and #2
            Nah. Ruiz never became #1 because it was clear that Fury and Wilder would've demolished him.

            Wilder and Fury who were #2 and #3 got promoted to #1 and #2.

            Joshua got knocked out by a fat lad and thus needs to earn his spot back, and he can only do that by beating Wilder or Fury.

            Comment

            • Robbie Barrett
              Banned
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Nov 2013
              • 40891
              • 2,779
              • 667
              • 570,921

              #7
              Originally posted by denium
              Nah. Ruiz never became #1 because it was clear that Fury and Wilder would've demolished him.

              Wilder and Fury who were #2 and #3 got promoted to #1 and #2.

              Joshua got knocked out by a fat lad and thus needs to earn his spot back, and he can only do that by beating Wilder or Fury.
              Ruiz was the #1, he was rated #1. Wilder lost to Fury how can he be #1 now? Makes zero sense.

              Comment

              • removed
                Undisputed Champion
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Nov 2008
                • 21479
                • 4,005
                • 831
                • 164,542

                #8
                Originally posted by Robbie Barrett
                Ruiz was the #1, he was rated #1. Wilder lost to Fury how can he be #1 now? Makes zero sense.

                https://www.tbrb.org/2019/11/12/12-november-2019/
                He's not #1, he's #2.

                Comment

                • Robbie Barrett
                  Banned
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Nov 2013
                  • 40891
                  • 2,779
                  • 667
                  • 570,921

                  #9
                  Originally posted by denium
                  He's not #1, he's #2.
                  Wilder is now #1



                  Robberies get ignored after a while.

                  Comment

                  • removed
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Nov 2008
                    • 21479
                    • 4,005
                    • 831
                    • 164,542

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Robbie Barrett
                    Yeah that's silly, Fury beat Wilder so it should be;

                    1) Fury
                    2) Wilder
                    3) Joshua

                    Fury and Wilder are still #1 and #2 tho.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP