Michael Spinks is up there.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
At Their Peak, Who is the most Dominant Fighter Of All Time?
Collapse
-
Originally posted by PBP View PostDoes dominating numerous top 10 contenders in your division with 2 dominating wins over future hall of famers mean that you are on of the most dominant fighters in your era?
Does being the undisputed champion at light heavyweight mean that you were dominant?
Does winning world titles at Middleweight, Super Middleweight, Light Heavyweight and Heavyweight a sign of dominance?
Or how about being the first middleweight champion to win a heavyweight title in over 106 years?
I think so.
I'm not going to defend his resume because it lags against other all time greats. But to deny this man's dominance in his prime is just hating.
Funny thing is that Toney beat the same "champ." I don't care if Jones administered his steroids more effectively in order to beat the testing.
Comment
-
I suppose that Floyd may deserve some mention, based on the simple test: who around his weight division does anyone see him losing to?
Comment
-
Originally posted by PBP View PostAgain, Roy Jones resume is mediocre. B-/C+ at best. But as I've stated in my other post, his level of dominance during his era cannot be questioned. Especially when seeing how he toyed with the #3 pound for pound fighter in the world at the time.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Nodogoshi View PostDoes beating one of the worst heavyweight "champions" of all time diminish the accomplishment?
Funny thing is that Toney beat the same "champ." I don't care if Jones administered his steroids more effectively in order to beat the testing.
Why would a fighter of Toney's caliber defeating a common opponent diminish that achievement?
Comment
-
-
-
Comment