Boxing Forum
Navigation
Go Back   Boxing Forum > Boxing Forums > Boxing History

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 08-12-2011, 01:15 PM #11
jabsRstiff jabsRstiff is offline
! ! ! !
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 9,484
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Rep Power: 4034
jabsRstiff has a reputation beyond reputejabsRstiff has a reputation beyond reputejabsRstiff has a reputation beyond reputejabsRstiff has a reputation beyond reputejabsRstiff has a reputation beyond reputejabsRstiff has a reputation beyond reputejabsRstiff has a reputation beyond reputejabsRstiff has a reputation beyond reputejabsRstiff has a reputation beyond reputejabsRstiff has a reputation beyond reputejabsRstiff has a reputation beyond repute
Points: 23,630.92
Bank: 156,191,111,391.41
Total Points: 156,191,135,022.33
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clegg View Post
I would guess that he was better than Mickey Rourke.

No one should make a comeback in their 50s. Despite what Foreman and Hopkins have done, very very few should be fighting in their 40s.
Danza was a boxer who was discovered, and became an actor. I believe it was the othe way around for Rourke.

Danza was a real fighter, Rourke was a novelty.
jabsRstiff is offline   Reply With Quote
Advertisements
>>>TO REMOVE THESE ADS, PLEASE REGISTER HERE FOR FREE<<<
Reply

Share This With Friends

User Tag List

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
Forum Jump


 

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:15 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.