|02-25-2010, 05:33 PM||#31|
Join Date: Nov 2008
Quoted: 0 Post(s)Rep Power: 10
Total Points: 283,825.94
if you're a 'pure' counter puncher or boxer against a strong fighter like tyson or cotto, you will need to move around or let the pace be written by the opponent for a big part, in which u keep reacting to your opponent's choices. so then if u talk of ring generalship and such, u can't just blatantly say that if you're a pure counter puncher following ur opponents' lead.
i think an example might be toney-jirov off the top of my head, not sure though, u can correct me if i'm wrong.
|02-25-2010, 05:35 PM||#32|
Conveyor of Truth
Join Date: Jan 2008
Quoted: 119 Post(s)Rep Power: 34
Total Points: 2,000,150,228,071,824.75
all the criterias are equally important.
most ppl dont know first thing about scoring a fight though.. cant tell effective aggression from plain aggression, dont understand the meaning of ring generalship and dont give enough credit for defence. alot of ppl cant even tell a landed punch from a missed one.
they basicly just watch whos throwing more punches which is BS. if a fighter makes their oponent miss that counts for something.
i mean most ppl dont even know thats a criteria. watch my page and see baracuda trying to tell me defence doesnt score points, he calls himself a boxing fan but doesnt know jack **** about the sport.
and the same thing goes for alot of ppl.
|02-25-2010, 05:51 PM||#33|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Quoted: 1 Post(s)Rep Power: 26
Total Points: 101,395,836,993.34
The more aggressive fighter pushing forward througout the fight, outworking their oponent, landing the bigger cleaner shots...
|02-25-2010, 05:52 PM||#34|
Join Date: Aug 2009
Quoted: 0 Post(s)Rep Power: 20
Total Points: 2,579,736.51
I'd say it's effective aggression. A guy can still win honestly without necessarily scoring the cleanest blows. It's about who's blows are more effective.
|Share This With Friends|
|criteria, fight, important, scoring, what's, you?|