|05-24-2008, 04:05 PM||#1|
Join Date: May 2008
Quoted: 0 Post(s)Rep Power: 0
Total Points: 8,157.04
Which belt is the best ?
hey guys i am a boxing fan but have only seriously been a mega fan for the past 1-2 years. now i am a footballer by trade but i use boxing training for balance agility and stamina , since i been using boxing for my fitness i been watchin alot more of boxing, and u see these fighters with different belts, now i dont know personally which is the best if there is one? i like the wbc but thats just because of apperance, replies will be excellent thank you.
|05-24-2008, 04:08 PM||#3|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Quoted: 177 Post(s)Rep Power: 14
Total Points: 10,053,008,578.08
WBC is generally considered the most prestigious, then the IBF and WBA. Those are the three titles a fighter needs to win to be deemed "undisputed" (though a bunch of fighters call themselves undisputed; like David Haye; without winning them all). WBO comes fourth. No other belts matter. Except for the Ring magazine belt which the Bible of boxing awards to the supposed "best" fighters in each division, the linear champions.
|05-24-2008, 04:08 PM||#4|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Brownsville, Tx
Quoted: 97 Post(s)Rep Power: 68
Total Points: 9,921,414,521,877,236.00
to be honest, all of them are ****. each organization is corrupt and will gladly manipulate for you if you can get them money. If i was a pro fighter, i really wouldn't fight for belts, but more for the glory of taken down big prime names.
|05-24-2008, 04:10 PM||#7|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: En el Carajo
Quoted: 48 Post(s)Rep Power: 66
Total Points: 17,401,828,107.67
the wba is the oldest,the wbc is the most crooked the ibf is i don't give a **** and the wbo are the party crashers.the ring mag belt is losing cred.
|05-24-2008, 04:45 PM||#8|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Quoted: 15 Post(s)Rep Power: 58
Total Points: 152,509,245,436,536,192.00
The Ring belt. They haven't done anything yet to lose their credibility.
|05-24-2008, 04:50 PM||#9|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Quoted: 197 Post(s)Rep Power: 38
Total Points: 223,779,774,188,314,784.00
|05-24-2008, 04:55 PM||#10|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Wichita, KS
Quoted: 0 Post(s)Rep Power: 65
Total Points: 114,141,187.71
Even if Oscar has the control of the magazine, he isn't a Ring champion. No vacant ring belts have been decided in stupid matchups.
The only vacant one since Oscar bought the magazine was Pacquiao vs. Marquez, and if you don't think that was justified, you are out of your mind.
The Ring belt has been using the same rules it always has.
Like warp said, it hasn't lost any credibility to this point.
That being said, the Ring belt is clearly the most legitimate... it is always the linear champion or a guy who has set himself apart from the crowd if there was no previous champion.
Other than that, it is considered that the WBC, WBA and IBF are the best, closely followed by the WBO. The WBO is still the "new guy" of the group, but is becoming more and more recognized as legitimate.
|Share This With Friends|