OFFICIAL: Donald Trump thread.

[BERNIE'S CORNER]

Oh I see. You're asking ME why 90% of blacks vote Democrat.

Simple.

One. Blacks can't compete with whites in a free market so they want as much government, socialism and affirmative action as possible.

Two. Blacks want to commit crime with reduced or no consequences and democrats are for that as well.

Go ahead and continue to hide behind your phone and or p c with those stereotypical racist views.

Im done with you coward.

Next time you come across a man of any color on the day to day ?

Go ahead and express your views to em publicly @ss wipe but then again maybe you have already ?

[BERNIE'S CORNER]

ok,

do educate us simple folk micahel eric dyson.

why do black uniformly vote democrat when democrats have had inner ciity control for how long yet no improvements???

i wanna hear this....

Reading comprehension.

Practice it and get back to me !

Or not !

[SterlingStained]

Reading comprehension.

Practice it and get back to me !

Or not !

lol, scared b*tch like carmelo anthony.

just as i expected.

fck off coward.

[BERNIE'S CORNER]

lol, scared b*tch like carmelo anthony.

just as i expected.

fck off coward.

What does Carmelo have to do with this political thread ???

You need to stay on your meds kid.....

[SterlingStained]

What does Carmelo have to do with this political thread ???

You need to stay on your meds kid.....

sigh....

smdh.....

im comparing carmelo's coward ass to your coward ass because as expected,

when i asked you to explain your position,

you b*tched out like carmelo circa his nugget days when he suckered punch jeffries then ran like a little *****.

again,

explain to us,

why blacks uniformly vote democrats.

ill wait,

thanks in advance,

b*tch.

[Xoo]

Go ahead and continue to hide behind your phone and or p c with those stereotypical racist views.

I shouldn't have to hide but I live under a soft totalitarian government where I'm Hitler reincarnated for simply saying the truth.

Im done with you coward.

Oh come on. I wanna hear you tell me why 90% of black people vote democrat. As if you're going to give me an answer that would surprise me.

Next time you come across a man of any color on the day to day ?

Go ahead and express your views to em publicly @ss wipe but then again maybe you have already ?

And what point would that serve? You think every black guy on this planet is capable of beating me in a fight? Guess again. I don't go around in the real world looking to start fights with people.

[BostonGuy]

Another "Ami short film" on voter ID laws

[B.UTLER]

Another "Ami short film" on voter ID laws

I do believe voters should be required ID but this video is stupid. He just interviewed a few people to get his message. I'm sure there are blacks without ID. Although majority of them have.

[BostonGuy]

I do believe voters should be required ID but this video is stupid. He just interviewed a few people to get his message. I'm sure there are blacks without ID. Although majority of them have.

Well, then the argument that "blacks don't have IDs, the system is racist" is invalid. And I'm sure you can say the same thing about white "majority of them have."

Yes, I realize that Ami has an agenda and he's interviewing the right people to make his point, but regardless, I think "liberals" or "progressives" share this sentiment of 'soft bigotry of lower expectations' when it comes to blacks.

[jaded]

Hillary Clinton Arrested for Perjury



The FBI has arrested Hillary Clinton and charged her with perjury, citing the apparent conflict between her 2015 congressional testimony about her email practices and the FBI's conclusions announced in July, according to a letter to the U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia.

The Justice Department Assistant Attorney General for Legislative Affairs, Peter Kadzik, confirmed in an Aug. 2 letter to both committees they had the perjury investigation request and the department would "take appropriate action as necessary."

The one-page response offered no timeline nor specific commitment to act on the allegations.

According to the Justice Department website, Kadzik, "led the successful effort to confirm Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch and Deputy Attorney General Sally Q. Yates." Both women were central players handling the Clinton email matter.

Chaffetz and Goodlatte, who have direct oversight for the FBI, wrote to the U.S. attorney that Clinton testified under oath on Oct. 22, 2015, before the Benghazi Select Committee, where she also took questions about her email practices from Republican congressman Jim Jordan of Ohio.

The letter continued, "Contrary to her sworn testimony, Secretary Clinton's lawyers did not read each email in her personal account to identify all the work related messages."

Clinton told Jordan that her team "went through every single email." The FBI Director said his investigators found that Clinton's lawyers did not read all the emails, and relied on a narrow set of search terms to identify which emails were work-related.

Clinton also testified to Congress there was only one server.

But the FBI Director said investigators found "Clinton used several different servers and administrators of those servers during her four years at the State Department and used numerous mobile devices to review and send e-mail on that personal domain."

The congressmen emphasized that while Clinton told Congress, and the public, she turned over all her work-related emails, the FBI found otherwise.

"I provided you, with all my work related emails, all that I had. Approximately 55,000 pages. And they are being publicly released," Clinton testified. But FBI investigators found "several thousand work related emails that were not in the group of 30,000 that were returned by Secretary Clinton to State in 2014."

In the course of its investigation, the FBI recovered most but not all of the deleted records. The search included “the laborious review of the millions of email fragments dumped into the slack space of the server decomissioned in 2013."

A retired assistant FBI director, and 28-year-veteran of the bureau, said a perjury review is generally straightforward for agents.

"They look at the transcript of the testimony they provided in light of what they know to be, suspect to be the truth. They investigate both sides and take the aggregate and turn it over to the prosecuting authority for a decision," Steven Pomerantz said.

"Since the Director (Comey) already established what she (Clinton) said and the investigation is complete, it would be a relatively simple matter to make a decision about perjury... given the history of this, it's hard to say - it would seem to me a matter of weeks not months in this case."

A violation of 18 USC 1621 can lead to a fine, imprisonment up to five years, or both though legal experts said the crux of the case will rely on showing intent.

When Comey testified July 7, Clinton's campaign said some of his statements vindicated the candidate's public statements.

Comey has reconciled every apparent contradiction in regards to Clinton's public statements.

Disclaimer: dubious source unconfirmed