Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

What Eric Morales would have done to Lomachenko

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    To everyone above Loma is not a slickster, he's a mover...difference.

    50/50 fight...people point out Morales struggles against Raheem, but he was past his best in a weight class that was past his best, the sparring stories between him and Floyd reveal far more about his ability to fight that style. I think Loma has a style that translates well to moving up in weight...but him against a Prime Terrible at 130, that's tough

    Comment


    • #22
      Morales would get no mas like rigo.

      Comment


      • #23
        Morales would have stopped Lomachenko. A few mild shots from pedraze tamed lomachenko Morales would put that hurt on em.

        And comparing loma to rahemm lmfao this how you knows fools DONT KNOW **** ABOUT BOXING they dotn even realize what they are seeing in boxers lmfao. + Morales was done after the 1st pac fight, hell people were saying he was done after his MAB wars and The Pacquaio WIN was the last real hoorah for Morales.

        Comment


        • #24
          I would favor Loma and his superior speed and footwork. Close fight, where each fighter wins close rounds.

          Comment


          • #25
            loma wins an easy UD.

            Comment


            • #26
              Originally posted by Mexican_Puppet View Post
              Loma was in prime. Months later of his L against Salido. He beat Russell JR easily
              You cannot be prime in your second pro fight, Lomo is still learning professional boxing and the irony is it was his lack of experience that beat him, he hasnt reached his peak yet.

              Comment


              • #27
                Originally posted by Mexican_Puppet View Post
                Loma was in prime. Months later of his L against Salido. He beat Russell JR easily
                He wasn’t in his prime against Russell. He started to peak around 2016 with the Martinez and Walters fights. He was putting more into his shots and looked noticeably better. He dominated Russell but it’s nonsense to say that’s his prime.

                Espadas deserved the win over Morales in their first fight. He was hard done by and even hurt Morales at the end.

                Also, Morales listed his top 10 Mexican fighters of all-time today and didn’t include Sánchez. Is he a dumbass?

                Comment


                • #28
                  Originally posted by Roadblock View Post
                  You cannot be prime in your second pro fight, Lomo is still learning professional boxing and the irony is it was his lack of experience that beat him, he hasnt reached his peak yet.
                  Yeah the notion that he was prime in his 2nd or 3rd fight is hilariously flawed. Even Salido himself said how much better Loma is now. He improved dramatically every fight from his 2nd fight probably until this last fight. That’s obvious looking at the fights. Confidence, the way he punches, the movement, the way he handles what opponents do etc;

                  It’s like saying Marquez was prime vs. Norwood.

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    morales loses badly to lomachenko. loma with his faster hands and feet would have frustrated morales. morales struggles against a highly technical fighter like loma. loma wins handily by decision.

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      Morales whips Loma in his prime. Y’all are thinking about old Morales after a ton of wars

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP