Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Andre CaWK fighter wards best illegal tactic ?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    Originally posted by The Big Dunn View Post
    Who gives a fuck what Kov thinks? Never care what quitters think and won't start with Quitalev, I mean kovaquit, you know what I mean..
    A lot more people than just Kovalev think it...




    ...

    Comment


    • #22
      the clinch was his trademark.

      Comment


      • #23
        On second thought, I changed my mind.

        While I feel the solid clinch work has been the foundation of his success his entire career, I think the moment that really punctuated his career, his high watermark of illegal tactical success, was finishing Kovalev with low blows.

        He went out with a bang. It was as flagrant as can be, and yet somehow he still gets away with it.

        Comment


        • #24
          Originally posted by FrankieBruno View Post
          Us Brits and Americans are boxing specialists, between us we control boxing.

          Now jog on you minge
          I don't know, you got Loma, GGG, Kovalev, Usyk, Gvozdyk, the Klitschko brothers past reign, pretty much dominating across the board... Besides Anthony Joshua you clowns don't have shlt.

          Comment


          • #25
            Originally posted by The Big Dunn View Post
            Who gives a fuck what Kov thinks? Never care what quitters think and won't start with Quitalev, I mean kovaquit, you know what I mean..
            can call him a quitter but how about you let someone punch you in the balls and see what your instant reaction is....

            Comment


            • #26
              Originally posted by Vlad_ View Post
              A lot more people than just Kovalev think it.


              ...
              I scored it for Kov as well. But I go with the official scoring of the judges. Ward is officially 2-0, 1KO against Kov. Kov is 0-2-0 1Q against Ward.

              Give you one guess what the Q is for??????

              Comment


              • #27
                Originally posted by Mukuro View Post
                On second thought, I changed my mind.

                While I feel the solid clinch work has been the foundation of his success his entire career, I think the moment that really punctuated his career, his high watermark of illegal tactical success, was finishing Kovalev with low blows.

                He went out with a bang. It was as flagrant as can be, and yet somehow he still gets away with it.
                ... it clearly shows that it was on the belt line, doe!

                Comment


                • #28
                  Originally posted by The Big Dunn View Post
                  I scored it for Kov as well. But I go with the official scoring of the judges. Ward is officially 2-0, 1KO against Kov. Kov is 0-2-0 1Q against Ward.

                  Give you one guess what the Q is for??????
                  The Q is for losing (on paper) against Ward twice and still beating him up so bad WARD QUIT AND RETIRED after a so called TKO win...

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    Originally posted by DramaShow View Post
                    can call him a quitter but how about you let someone punch you in the balls and see what your instant reaction is....
                    Stop making excuses for this quitter. The truth is he's looked weak ever since they caught Povetkin with the melodium or whatever it was. Ward knew if he just worked the body he would crumble.

                    You guys are funny. You want ward DQ'd or something like that but these are the same tactics you fuckboys say should be used to beat guys like Floyd or Crawford.

                    Can't have it both ways.

                    Book your hotels now. There might be a lot of Oakland people at the ceremony.
                    Last edited by The Big Dunn; 09-21-2017, 12:36 PM.

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      Originally posted by MDPopescu View Post
                      ... it clearly shows that it was on the belt line, doe!

                      Well hey, as long as the slick American wins over the Russian, does it really matter if he did it illegally? Apparently that is good enough for the NSAC

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP