Originally posted by kafkod
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Wilder Manager Updates on Talks To Fight Ortiz, Joshua, Fury
Collapse
-
Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Postthey bought Martin's belt..... just like they bought Parker's belt
they were willing to pay Parker 32.5% for his belt
it is funny as hell that Team Bullshlt have never made Wilder an offer that was an good as the offer they made Parker loooool
I will paint you a picture.....
AJ did not offer Wilder as much as he offered Parker because he did not want to get K****** T** F*** O** by Wilder
you fill in the blanks
OK, I get where you fools are coming from now.
Comment
-
-
-
Originally posted by hitking View PostDoes Wlad losing to Fury prior to AJ mean nothing to you???
Same for those somehow making some sort of comparison of Joshua KOing Breazeale in the 7th, but Wilder KO'd him in 1. So what? What does that mean? Nothing.
Comment
-
Originally posted by kafkod View PostIt means nothing other than that Wlad lost to Fury.
Does Wilder getting schooled 10 out of 12 rounds by a shadow of the Tyson Fury who beat Wlad mean nothing to you?
Comment
-
Originally posted by kafkod View PostSo paying a professional world champion to defend his title = "buying his belt"
OK, I get where you fools are coming from now.
" champion "
over-paying 2x paper " champions ", because you can beat them..... but then low-balling, roadblocking, ducking, a legit "champion", because he could leave you lying senseless..... is ducking
..... he bought the easy belts, but did not want to risk paying the price for the hard one
AJ did exactly what Canelo did at 168..... he fought the easy guy, hereby "buying" his belt..... there were better fighters more deserving of that payday, just like when AJ bought his belt off Martin.....
the two threats for AJ at heavyweight are Wilder and Fury
it is no coincidence that AJ has not fought either of them
Fury will fight anyone, and Wilder will fight anyone..... so they are #1 and #2 in the division..... considering that AJ has no claim to being better than either of them, they both have a claim over AJLast edited by aboutfkntime; 05-24-2019, 06:31 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by diplo View PostSince when in boxing does that sort of comparison make any difference? Joshua couldn't put Parker down. Whyte put him down twice. But Joshua KO'd Whyte. So what?
Same for those somehow making some sort of comparison of Joshua KOing Breazeale in the 7th, but Wilder KO'd him in 1. So what? What does that mean? Nothing.
Comment
-
Originally posted by hitking View PostSo we credit AJ for beating the Wlad that dominated the division for a decade. Even though he looked like s.hit against Jennings and got his ass kicked by Ortiz. Are you serious right now?
what I don't get is... Fury beat Klitschko and took his belts, not AJ
how come AJ fans are quick to forget that fact..... ?
how come they are also quick to forget that AJ is not only avoiding Wilder, he will not fight Fury either
Comment
-
Originally posted by Deontay Wilder View PostIt's up to AJ, Wilder, Skipper, and Finkel to set this thing up.
If all parties aren't satisfied, Ortiz is the backup plan.
If it's not glaringly obvious to any human being at this point who wants it and who is vascillating and f*****g around then you can't tell your arse from your elbow.
Wilder doesnt fancy it. It's pretty obvious by now.
Comment
Comment