He will get in as soon as the sufficient time passes.
It's not even up for debate, he's a guaranteed hall of famer.
For me, and a lot of people, Andre Ward is borderline. Him and Froch have a very similar resume, except Ward has a win over him, and he has looked dominant against everyone he has fought.
For me, and a lot of people, Andre Ward is borderline. Him and Froch have a very similar resume, except Ward has a win over him, and he has looked dominant against everyone he has fought.
Its definitely up for debate imo.
I think he will get in though
Froch is borderline for me and Ward is not even close to HOF status.
For Ward to get in, he would need another 4 significant wins over a year and a half time frame as a minimum and no more cans for the remainder of his career. He also needs to fight away from his home base on a regular basis, at least 50% of his fights.
Froch is borderline for me and Ward is not even close to HOF status.
For Ward to get in, he would need another 4 significant wins over a year and a half time frame as a minimum and no more cans for the remainder of his career. He also needs to fight away from his home base on a regular basis, at least 50% of his fights.
Froch is borderline for me and Ward is not even close to HOF status.
For Ward to get in, he would need another 4 significant wins over a year and a half time frame as a minimum and no more cans for the remainder of his career. He also needs to fight away from his home base on a regular basis, at least 50% of his fights.
Yes. People would respect Ward more if he wasn't such a stay-at-home prima donna.
Froch is borderline for me and Ward is not even close to HOF status.
For Ward to get in, he would need another 4 significant wins over a year and a half time frame as a minimum and no more cans for the remainder of his career. He also needs to fight away from his home base on a regular basis, at least 50% of his fights.
The guy that didn't know what undisputed is and didn't know if the Ring Magazine belt exists a week ago, thinks he now knows enough to have an opinion on who should or shouldn't be in the Hall Of Fame.
If Ward needs to do what you say then what does Golovkin have to do? Wards resume is far greater than his.
Probably, but he shouldnt be. Fighters like Mancini and Gatti should be acceptions because they defined boxing in their era with their all action time after time foty performances.
Being a moderately successful banger that lost all your important fights shouldn't qualify you for the HOF. Maybe British hall of fame, but he has never even been the best 168lber at any point in his career, so its hard to make a case.
Comment