Originally posted by Sir TomJones
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Carl Froch credits Polish lineage for boxing attributes
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Medved View PostThere's a reason Carl Froch and Amir Khan are UK's best fighters. Cuz they hardly have any British blood in themOriginally posted by Dedication View PostAnd before them Calzaghe - who had Italian ancestry
Comment
-
Originally posted by Medved View PostLook at bums like Burns, Cook, DeGayle, Barker, etc etc etc. and the countless other bums on the Warren/Shaughnessy/Maloney roster.
99% of them are
-Drama Queens
- 5"5
-20-30% KO%
-Stink the joint up
-Never in an exciting fight
This is why as soon as some UK Boxer gets any publicity or fame they get the hell out of there
Lewis,Khan,Froch,Haye all fighting in USA/Europe.
Yet all those other guys are too busy fighting in some scottish pub on Sky Sports for the BBBoC Super Duper Junior European Diamond Belt
Only an ignorant idiot such as your self would credit a fighters attributes on his heritage alone.
And the fact that you mention Degale in this pathetic attempt to slur British fighters i don’t know what makes your ignorant self think that Degale is more British than Froch maybe its the dark skin or the very British sounding name of ‘Degale’.Last edited by -Lowkey-; 10-29-2011, 12:52 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sir TomJones View Postthe best americans have mexican and african blood in them lol.
Every American boxer there has ever been has ancestors foreign to American soil.
Comment
-
I've never been embarrassed by a British boxers performance. They usually put it all on the line even if they are out of there depth.
G-Locks performance against Pavlik is the closest. But he was massively outgunned - but there is something to be said for being willing to get gloriously knocked out.
Comment
Comment