Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Pernell Whitaker - CompuBox Looks Back

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Good stats for a guy remembered primarily for his defense. No wonder he was an ATG.

    Comment


    • #12
      surprised that Winky is not in the top 5 for most landed jabs

      Comment


      • #13
        Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Post
        nah, because landed punches are not official scoring criteria

        even a fkn idiot would know that

        clean hard punching, son..... clean hard punching

        tell me something.....

        does compubox use the official scoring criteria to judge whether a punch lands..... or do they use "other" criteria..... ?

        "clean effective punching"


        You are fuking ******ed if you dont think that landed punches are a necessity for clean effecting punching.


        You also are a complete noob if you dont understand how compubox tracks landed punches. its been explained many times during boxing broadcasts. You must not watch boxing.

        Comment


        • #14
          Originally posted by Jab jab boom View Post
          Yeah, landed punches have nothing to do with scoring boxing. Lmaooo. You're just a groupie for the 1 fighter who has 4 fights where he was out landed overall, out landed in the majority of rounds in those 4 fights, yet still came away with 0 losses from those 4 fights. So you're using this Whitaker forum to complain about compubox because your level of fandom in on 10000. Like I said, you're so transparent.


          landed punches =/= clean hard punching

          what don't you understand about that, you compubox reading fool?

          learn the sport.....

          Comment


          • #15
            Originally posted by el*** View Post
            "clean effective punching"


            You are fuking ******ed if you dont think that landed punches are a necessity for clean effecting punching.


            You also are a complete noob if you dont understand how compubox tracks landed punches. its been explained many times during boxing broadcasts. You must not watch boxing.


            You are fuking ******ed if you think that all landed punches equate to clean hard punching

            fighters lose despite supposedly landing more all the time

            this is the hurt game, not the am's

            check the video in the post above

            Comment


            • #16
              Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Post
              landed punches =/= clean hard punching

              what don't you understand about that, you compubox reading fool?

              learn the sport.....

              yep, and all of that includes landing actual punches you ret@rd. You know your argument against compubox strictly relates to your love for Canelo. Do me a favor and find 1 other fighter that has lost total landed punches on compubox AND has also been outlanded in more rounds than not as per compubox in 4 different fights, yet still came away with 0 losses.

              Comment


              • #17
                Originally posted by Jab jab boom View Post
                yep, and all of that includes landing actual punches you ret@rd. You know your argument against compubox strictly relates to your love for Canelo. Do me a favor and find 1 other fighter that has lost total landed punches on compubox AND has also been outlanded in more rounds than not as per compubox in 4 different fights, yet still came away with 0 losses.

                Comment


                • #18
                  Originally posted by Jab jab boom View Post
                  yep, and all of that includes landing actual punches you ret@rd. You know your argument against compubox strictly relates to your love for Canelo. Do me a favor and find 1 other fighter that has lost total landed punches on compubox AND has also been outlanded in more rounds than not as per compubox in 4 different fights, yet still came away with 0 losses.


                  nope, many " landed " punches, are not official scoring criteria

                  and many " landed " punches according to compubox.... are a myth

                  FACT #1: compubox do not use the official scoring criteria when judging "landed" punches..... making their opinion irrelevant

                  FACT #2: compubox are inaccurate, period..... so their statistics have no relevance to the outcome of a professional boxing match

                  you are just a typical compubox-reading casual-fan idiot

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    Originally posted by nelovsggg-8 View Post


                    lmao !

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      Originally posted by aboutfkntime View Post
                      nope, many " landed " punches, are not official scoring criteria

                      and many " landed " punches according to compubox.... are a myth

                      FACT #1: compubox do not use the official scoring criteria when judging "landed" punches..... making their opinion irrelevant

                      FACT #2: compubox are inaccurate, period..... so their statistics have no relevance to the outcome of a professional boxing match

                      you are just a typical compubox-reading casual-fan idiot
                      See, you couldn't answer my question. Your boy is the only one who keeps losing via compubox stats in multiple fights (4 to be exact) and still doesn't take an L. No other fighter has been able to override compubox stats consistently like your idol. That's why you hate compubox.. It exploits the judges favoritism of Canelo and that hurts your v@gina.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP