Originally posted by LacedUp
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Kell Brook To Errol Spence: I Won't Vacate, You Are Next!
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by boliodogs;17421396[BFighting Spence is the right thing to do[/B].Good for Brook. A good champion fights the best challenger even if he loses. I am sure Spence will knock him out but win, lose or draw I admire him for fighting Spence when the other top welterweights don't want to fight him.
All the debates about who is better will be settled in the ring.
As a fight fan that is all one can ask for.
Kudos to the IBF for standing their ground on this. Defend your title or be stripped!!
Keep it simple.
Comment
-
Guess a lot of ppl on here were wrong about Brook all said he was a coward wouldn't give him props for going up to 160 to fight Golovkin and he fought 3 rounds with a broken eye socket and still wouldn't go down now he is fighting the WW thats supposedly the next big thing because its his mandatory like a true champion
Either of them could lose this fight its 50/50 they are both taking a big risk something thats been lacking in boxing for years but no doubt the loser will still get called a bum/Hype job/Fraud
Comment
-
Originally posted by Boxing Logic View PostThe bar is low for the whole sport now ever since floyd lowered it and convinced his racial fan boys that was acceptable. keith thurman spelled it all out how floyd ducked him while he was mandatory. he ducked pacman when pac was mandatory too or at least said he would ignore the belts if they tried to mandate it. since ggg kovalev and a few others are the only ones fighting anyone in their division these days, it deserves to be credited if brook does it.
you fkn pacstain idiot
Comment
-
Originally posted by deathofaclown View PostSo true. People need to go back in time on this forum before Brook v Porter. People were saying Floyd would never fight Porter and they were talking like he was a monster. People will say that isn't true but it's all here on the forum.
they said the same thing about Guerrero, and they said the same thing about Ortiz
oh, and how could I forget Mosley
and Hatton LMAO..... for YEARS Hatton fanboys were saying that Mayweather would never had the balls, and would get the KTFO if he tried
Comment
-
Originally posted by OnePunch View PostActually, yes.
these days a fighter can avoid his mando and even go so far as to give up his title, and some around here will be like "a-side bidness doe, shot caller derp derp derp"
So yes, I celebrate him fighting a very tough mando. I wish he hadnt dicked around the past month with all the "maybes", but still, props for fighting the kid.....
Comment
-
Originally posted by davef View PostGuess a lot of ppl on here were wrong about Brook all said he was a coward wouldn't give him props for going up to 160 to fight Golovkin and he fought 3 rounds with a broken eye socket and still wouldn't go down now he is fighting the WW thats supposedly the next big thing because its his mandatory like a true champion
Either of them could lose this fight its 50/50 they are both taking a big risk something thats been lacking in boxing for years but no doubt the loser will still get called a bum/Hype job/Fraud
yep, but lets not get them confused
there are hardcore's
there are casuals
and there are tard/hater/fanboys..... not sure what you call them really
even the casuals don't run around screaming coward ducker bum, 24/7 like the tards do
Comment
-
-
Comment