Pacquiao more accurate puncher than Mayweather

[Ray*]

You people can't honestly, genuinely, truly be this stupid....I mean really? Really?

So what you're saying is that because Pac is less accurate, he's more accurate?

Or is it because Floyd fights with accuracy in mind and thus is more accurate, he's less accurate?

Hold on, no, wait....it's that because Floyd is more accurate by 15% than Pac but throws less, he isn't as accurate just because he throws less whereas Pac deliberately throws more punches that miss to set up power punches and that makes him more accurate because the punches that do land are the only ones that matter and because he lands more, but is less accurate, he's more accurate?

Have I got it right? Pac is more accurate because he throws more, but at a much lower connect %, and thus is more accurate anyway.

Is Pac blacker than Floyd too?

You really cannot make it up, am laughing so hard its not even funny...but i think their little brains might be thinking about the highlighted bit above..lol

[BennyST]

I explained why I taking the jabs out. Why do you think compubox has a seperate category for jabs?

It's a punch. It's the most important punch in boxing. It's part of the accuracy of a fighters punch stats. Pac lands at a much lower %. It's part of his punch stats.

Why not take out body punching too? For that matter, let's take out the straight left because that is Pac's most important punch and would confuse the issue.

Ok? So come back when you have looked at the video and taken out all of Pac's most accurate punches and the stuff that sets everything up for him and we can move on.

Until then, stop being such a daft ****ing tool, get over yourself, and get this through your thick head....Pac=33% accuracy of his punches, Mayweather=47% of his.

It's a real simple concept. In boxing you throw punches. The ones that land, out of all that you throw, make up your accuracy. If one fighter lands a higher %, that means he's more accurate. Does this compute? Is that reasoned enough for you or do I need to type slower? Maybe you need a special translator?

Accuracy is defined by what you land from what you throw. Taking certain select punches out of the equation is utterly meaningless. In terms of accuracy, it is all about how much you land overall from what you throw overall. If you're thick enough to think otherwise, **** off and start a new thread that isn't as stupid as this, like....

"Pac is the more accurate power puncher than Mayweather over their last six respective fights"

Their punch accuracy though? Pac is less accurate by 15%.

[skillswin]

zab by KO in 4!!

[Vadrigar.]

[Dedication]

Never thought I'd see the day where a thread like this would come into existence.

[The_Sandman]

To the TS.

It's not just about accuracy. Accuracy just means how much punches you can land out of the punches you threw. What Floyd does better than any boxer is being accurate at the right time. Accuracy is at its best when punches are thrown with good timing. Floyd Mayweather catches them when they are coming in so they collide against Floyd's punches instead of just getting tagged. They might not be powerful punches because Floyd is not a naturally strong puncher, but he uses his opponents aggression to magnify his power. I've said this in other threads as well, but its not about being accurate. It's about being effectively accurate. So, if you ask "Who is the more effectively accurate puncher?" Then the answer is Floyd Mayweather.

[Vadrigar.]

Some people seem to think Mayweather is the most accurate puncher but the truth of the matter is that Pacquiao is more accurate than Mayweather.

Pacquiao throw more punches and is a combination puncher, both these things redcue accuracy. On top of this Pacquiao is a harder puncher and throws harder puncher, another thing that will effect accuracy.

We also have to forget about the jab as the jab is use to open a defence and find range, so it can be used effectively even though it is not landing.

Pacquiao also lands his punches right on the button, bang on the chin, Mayweather punches are more scoring punches.

Pacquiao landed an astonishing 50% of his power punches against Mosley while Mayweather landed an impresiive 46%, still 4 % less than Pacquiao. And Mosley was in defensive mode when facing Pacquiao and Pacquiao was throwing more punches than Mayweather.






Pacquiao vs Mosley

177 / 353: 50%

http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/vi...osley-compubox

Mayweather Mosley

123 / 267: 46%

http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/vi...osley-compubox


Pacquiao vs Margarito

411 / 713: 58%

http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/vi...arito-compubox


Mayweather Marquez

105 / 177: 59%

http://compuboxonline.com/news.php?news_id=9


Pacquiao vs Clottey

232 / 682: 34%

http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/vi...ottey-compubox

Mayweather vs Hatton

257/100: 39%

http://boxrec.com/media/index.php/Fl...._Ricky_Hatton


Pacquiao vs Cotto

276 / 560: 49%

http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/vi...compubox-stats

Mayweather vs De La Hoya

241/138: 57%

http://boxrec.com/media/index.php?title=Fight:1149806


Pacquiao vs Hatton

65 / 105: 62%

http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/vi...atton-compubox

Mayweather vs Baldomir

258/131: 51%

http://boxrec.com/media/index.php?title=Fight:1104350

Pacquiao vs De la Hoya

195 / 333: 59%

http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/vi...-hoya-compubox


Mayweather vs Judah

145/295 49%

http://sports.espn.go.com/sports/box...ory?id=2402244



So what is there 6 fight average?

Pacquiao 52%


Mayweather 50.2%

There you have it the stats back up my theory and add to this Pacquiao throws more, hits harder and throws more combinations and higher punch combinations, you would have to agree Pacquiao is the more accurate puncher.

[ThunderWolf]

Yeh right, a failed thread that has already 123 replies within the day and 2,377 views. Kinda like the topic itself.

A successful failed thread and an accurate inaccuracy. Defined as a dilemma for some.

[Vadrigar.]

Yeh right, a failed thread that has already 123 replies for only a day and 2,377 views. Kinda like the topic itself.

A successful failed thread and an accurate inaccuracy. Defined as a dilemma for some.

It's obvious you haven't read the posts in this thread.

Anyway move along ******* smh..

[ThunderWolf]

It's obvious you haven't read the posts in this thread.

Anyway move along ******* smh..

... you keep replying to your alleged failed thread thus making it successful. Go figure, dumb *****.