If a natural boxer has to spend 6 weeks cutting weight and 6 weeks training, while the same fighter who's using banned substances only has to spend 3 weeks cutting weight and gets to spend 9 weeks on training/preparing for his opponent, which outcome is preferred so long as you don't get caught?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Banning drug cheat Neloterol will become a very good example for the sport of boxing
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by joesaiditstrue View PostIf a natural boxer has to spend 6 weeks cutting weight and 6 weeks training, while the same fighter who's using banned substances only has to spend 3 weeks cutting weight and gets to spend 9 weeks on training/preparing for his opponent, which outcome is preferred so long as you don't get caught?
i will ask you to do what witch hunters refuse to do, go watch roids/p'e'ds in action. let me know if you see anything special happening.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Elroy The Great View Postyou still have to fight the fight.
i will ask you to do what witch hunters refuse to do, go watch roids/p'e'ds in action. let me know if you see anything special happening.
yeah, and common sense dictates the fighter who was allowed to spend more time preparing for his opponent vs cutting weight would have a greater chance of success in winning his fight
if you have 3 days to prepare for a test, or you can spend 6 days preparing, which of the two scenarios gives you a greater chance of passing your test?
you're a dope
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by joesaiditstrue View Post"You still have to fight the fight"
yeah, and common sense dictates the fighter who was allowed to spend more time preparing for his opponent vs cutting weight would have a greater chance of success in winning his fight
if you have 3 days to prepare for a test, or you can spend 6 days preparing, which of the two scenarios gives you a greater chance of passing your test?
you're a dope
matters on how that time is spent you complete moron !!!!! look go slurp on a c0ck and leave adult talk for adults.
dumb fnck
Comment
-
Originally posted by Elroy The Great View Postjust as i expected
NADA
mainly it's because they're unhealthy (enlarged organs, premature organ failure, muscle tissue and ligament damage, raised blood pressure, etc)
if you green light all peds, you're giving fighters willing to risk their health an advantage over those who aren't
also, they're federally illegal outside the scope of a physician's prescription
my two cents, have a separate boxing organization or league where these drugs are allowed use under the guidance of an expert or physician
Comment
-
Originally posted by joesaiditstrue View Posttop reason for banning peds in boxing?
mainly it's because they're unhealthy (enlarged organs, premature organ failure, muscle tissue and ligament damage, raised blood pressure, etc)
if you green light all peds, you're giving fighters willing to risk their health an advantage over those who aren't
also, they're federally illegal outside the scope of a physician's prescription
my two cents, have a separate boxing organization or league where these drugs are allowed use under the guidance of an expert or physician
once again (PPL, PLEASE STOP MAKING ME REPEAT COMMON SENSE !!!!!!!!!)
there are no health issues now, imagine how safer roid usage would be if they were !
Comment
Comment