the ONLY way for floyd to catch up to pacquiao historically is to beat spence or Bud

[hugh grant]

The great boxers in history have done some amazing things. Floyd s fans have Floyd as one of best of all time. So Floyd should try justifying praise by doing in real life that which will get him where his fans place him.
Floyd s known for being cautious so it's unlikely hes done anything too mind blowing like Pac did against thurman at 41. That was mind boggling. Better than anything Floyd ever did.

[aboutfkntime]

the ONLY way for floyd to catch up to pacquiao historically is to beat spence or Bud

the ONLY way for pacquiao to catch up to floyd historically is to beat floyd marquez AND canelo

which is hilarious

[aboutfkntime]

You guys are not used to seeing pacquiao fighting prime undefeated fighters as is nobody here. You are letting this good win go to your heads.

Why does a retired fighter who has been saying for years he isn’t the same fighters he was when he was younger and out of his prime need to come back in fight a middleweight THAT HE BEAT all ready to prove his greatness to ANOTHER PERSON HE BEAT ALL READY?

y’all are so desperate to see that 0 go that you will make up anything just so you can put pacquiao a guy/legend he beat all ready above him.

if anybody ever suggested that Pacquiao was only one win away from matching Mayweathers legacy (and nobody ever did)..... and that one win required by Pac happened to be named, Keith Thurman..... they would have been called a total fkn moron

NOW does everyone see where the Golovkin ret4rdation comes from?

it is the SAME ret4rdation

the same clowns who insist that Thurman bumped Pacquiao past Mayweather (lol)..... are the same fukwits who think that Golovkin has a better resume than Canelo

[IHITBACK]

10-2 he schooled him already only Trumpers believe otherwise.

[aboutfkntime]

The great boxers in history have done some amazing things. Floyd s fans have Floyd as one of best of all time. So Floyd should try justifying praise by doing in real life that which will get him where his fans place him.
Floyd s known for being cautious so it's unlikely hes done anything too mind blowing like Pac did against thurman at 41. That was mind boggling. Better than anything Floyd ever did.

what, that win was better than Mayweather's win over Pacquiao?

Thurman ???

#ret4rdation

[hugh grant]

what, that win was better than Mayweather's win over Pacquiao?

Thurman ???

#ret4rdation

Of course it was andbit was better than horns win over PAC alsoPACs got a better resume than Thurman of course but Thurman is unbeaten young lion and the current and future of division and PACs 41. In 100 years of boxing there have been weaker champions than Thurman but no 40 year olds have been able to take advantage. So context please. Don't disrespect PAC, Thurman and histories WWs.
PACs win over Thurman is greater than anything cautious Floyd has ever did. Better than cautious win over PAC, dominating win over jmm and over the great nelo. The great, green CW nelo that is. Floyd fans couldn't stop mentioning floyds ancient 36 years of age backnthen to elevates floyds win. But when PAC does it at 41 it's no longer a big deal? Floyd fans are so see thru. You can predict there every contradictions, and moves from miles away

[Larry the boss]

Floyd doesnt have to fight anymore period..hell he has promoted Manny's last 2 fights...

[aboutfkntime]

Of course it was andbit was better than horns win over PAC alsoPACs got a better resume than Thurman of course but Thurman is unbeaten young lion and the current and future of division and PACs 41. In 100 years of boxing there have been weaker champions than Thurman but no 40 year olds have been able to take advantage. So context please. Don't disrespect PAC, Thurman and histories WWs.
PACs win over Thurman is greater than anything cautious Floyd has ever did. Better than cautious win over PAC, dominating win over jmm and over the great nelo. The great, green CW nelo that is. Floyd fans couldn't stop mentioning floyds ancient 36 years of age backnthen to elevates floyds win. But when PAC does it at 41 it's no longer a big deal? Floyd fans are so see thru. You can predict there every contradictions, and moves from miles away

that is absolute and utter nonsense

just sillyness

Mayweather has a dozen wins that are better than Thurman

beating Pacquiao when he was 38 is MUCH better

beating Canelo when he was 36 is MUCH better

also..... Mayweather would have beaten Thurman today, yesterday, and tomorrow..... all at once

[The tucker]

Of course it was andbit was better than horns win over PAC alsoPACs got a better resume than Thurman of course but Thurman is unbeaten young lion and the current and future of division and PACs 41. In 100 years of boxing there have been weaker champions than Thurman but no 40 year olds have been able to take advantage. So context please. Don't disrespect PAC, Thurman and histories WWs.
PACs win over Thurman is greater than anything cautious Floyd has ever did. Better than cautious win over PAC, dominating win over jmm and over the great nelo. The great, green CW nelo that is. Floyd fans couldn't stop mentioning floyds ancient 36 years of age backnthen to elevates floyds win. But when PAC does it at 41 it's no longer a big deal? Floyd fans are so see thru. You can predict there every contradictions, and moves from miles away

Like I said Keith is a very good win for manny I’m not disputing that arguably manny’s best win this decade. But are you really going to say with a straight face that this win puts him over floyd and ranks higher than floyd beating canelo? You know deep you don’t believe that and just want to discredit floyd any way you can. You do know floyd beat pacquiao right?

[ShaneMosleySr]

He would have to beat Canelo Alvarez, Callum Smith and Sergey Kovalev.