Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Danny Jacobs vs Macej Sulecki is better than Murray-Saunders, Centeno-Charlo

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Danny Jacobs vs Macej Sulecki is better than Murray-Saunders, Centeno-Charlo

    But Andrade vs Darevyachenko is the Middleweight fight that is only second behind to Golovkin vs Canelo.

  • #2
    Originally posted by Thraxox View Post
    But Andrade vs Darevyachenko is the Middleweight fight that is only second behind to Golovkin vs Canelo.
    I don't know if Andrade vs Derevyanchenko happens though. Rozier calls Andrade his nephew and he's close with both guys.

    Comment


    • #3
      Jacobs vs Sulecki is a very good fight. Sulecki already KOed Centeno.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Thraxox View Post
        Danny Jacobs vs Macej Sulecki is better than Murray-Saunders
        Better in what way? A lot of people care about Saunders vs. Murray. Nobody cares about Jacobs vs. Sulecki.

        A lot is at stake in Saunders vs. Murray. Nothing is at stake in Jacobs vs. Sulecki.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF View Post
          Better in what way? A lot of people care about Saunders vs. Murray. Nobody cares about Jacobs vs. Sulecki.

          A lot is at stake in Saunders vs. Murray. Nothing is at stake in Jacobs vs. Sulecki.
          Charlo is fighting the guy who Sulecki KTFO, and beat the guy EASILY whom Andrade struggled back in Germany. How on earth is that not a reason unless you say "rankings doe.".

          Murray is shot, it is just for exposure and entertainment.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Thraxox View Post
            Charlo is fighting the guy who Sulecki KTFO, and beat the guy EASILY whom Andrade struggled back in Germany. How on earth is that not a reason unless you say "rankings doe.".
            Where did I say anything about Charlo?


            Murray is shot, it is just for exposure and entertainment.
            Exposure and entertainment are why the sport exists.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF View Post
              A lot is at stake in Saunders vs. Murray. Nothing is at stake in Jacobs vs. Sulecki.
              The Bob Arum belt and a last shot for a shot fighter is what's at stake in Saunders vs Murray. Murray gave us some good memories and legitimately got jobbed in his first two chances at a belt but he now struggles against guys like Rosado.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Mammoth View Post
                The Bob Arum belt and a last shot for a shot fighter is what's at stake in Saunders vs Murray. Murray gave us some good memories and legitimately got jobbed in his first two chances at a belt but he now struggles against guys like Rosado.
                The Arum/Warren belt is still more than nothing.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Miracle Man WAR

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF View Post
                    Better in what way? A lot of people care about Saunders vs. Murray. Nobody cares about Jacobs vs. Sulecki.

                    A lot is at stake in Saunders vs. Murray. Nothing is at stake in Jacobs vs. Sulecki.
                    ???

                    Murray is literally trash, he didn't couldn't even decisively beat Gabriel Rosado. Saunders is levels above him, Murray's a beaten man towards the end of his career barely has anything left lol its a joke of a fight.

                    Jacobs vs Sulecki is a great fight and plenty of people care about it...Jacobs arguably beat GGG and he's fighting an undefeated somewhat highly touted Sulecki who's coming off a big KO win over Centeno.

                    There is no question what fight between the two is the better fight.

                    All we care about is a good fight between two guys who are evenly matched, regardless of "what's at stake" or not. We just want good match ups as boxing fans. Ortiz vs. Alexander was a good fight and it was between two shot to **** irrelevant fighters who were in a must win situation.

                    Boxing is about match ups, Saunders-Murray is a terrible match up...Murray can't even beat David Lemieux who just got shutout 12-0 by Saunders lmao wtf are you saying.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP