Is Manny Pacquiao the most technical brawler in the history of boxing?

[wazaa.]

I can't think of any other brawler that is as technical sound as Manny.

[-EAGLE-]

yes he is.

[ManniePhresh]

i think that he technically better than is excepted. when he gets pressed he double jabs and left straights but thats when he is countered and pressed consistantly. he hasnt fought an exceptional counter puncher since marquez thats why i want to see him fight mayweather so bad because i honestly think he will get to frustrated but he could shock us.

[MCVAGINA]

I dont think he is that technical. Look at the Marquez fights

He was extremely lucky to get those wins and got countered at will, Even Cotto who is more of a brawler than a boxer caught Pacquiao alot coming in.

[StefanYHU]

I rate julio cesar chavez and erik morales above pacquiao, now thats what I call a brawler.

[bojangles1987]

No. He is far better than given credit for but he is definitely not the most technical.

[MCVAGINA]

No. He is far better than given credit for but he is definitely not the most technical.

Pacquiao far better than given credit for?

He gets so much credit its ridiculous

[Mickey Gomez]

Define what a brawler is in your opinion wazaa.

[bojangles1987]

Pacquiao far better than given credit for?

He gets so much credit its ridiculous

I meant he is far better technically than giving credit for. People think he just swings wild and has no defense or concept of setting up punches. That's simply not true, I thought the Cotto fight showed that.

[wazaa.]

yes he is.

so you agree with my knowledge, homie?