Ortiz, had better defense and more of an arsenal imo. It's like Pernell Whitaker and Terence Crawford. Terence Crawford is a more evolved Pernell while Ortiz is a more evolved Moorer.
Ortiz, had better defense and more of an arsenal imo. It's like Pernell Whitaker and Terence Crawford. Terence Crawford is a more evolved Pernell while Ortiz is a more evolved Moorer.
What If Crawford loses to Thurman? It doesn't change the fact that he is a level above guys like Wilfred, Cotto, Pernell, and Tszyu. Just like if Ortiz loses to Wilder it doesn't change the fact that Ortiz is above Moorer in every way.
There haven't been many good southpaw heavyweights that I know of. It really comes down to a fight between Moorer and Ortiz. I think Ortiz could beat him and was a better heavyweight. Ortiz is a big heavyweight while Moorer was a light heavyweight champion before he was heavyweight champion so he was a smaller heavyweight. I think Ortiz has more punching power and a better chin than Moorer. Moorer was right handed but fought from a southpaw stance. Joe Frazier and Sonny Liston were left handed but fought from a right handed stance.
I see people bringing up Moorer and Byrd but these fighters would have no chance in this current era of super heavies. Special in their era, just gate keepers at best in this era.
Put it this way, Ortiz has a whopping 10 inch reach advantage on Byrd, 3 inches in height, and 30lbs in pure muscle with an 80% KO ratio.
Comment