Do people seriously believe Floyd Mayweather Jr could beat Gennady Golovkin at 160?

[Mr Objecitivity]

Your main point is not a point its a fantasy and you said no fantasies allowed in this thread.

In my fantasy prime Floyd sticks and moves stealing a 12 rd decision by a wide margin, your fantasy bets on GGG landing solid, mine that he doesn't land anything of note, if you cant hit Floyd you cant win and he is a master of not getting hit.

Now if you think about it, you cannot debate a fantasy because its all BS and what is the point of debating BS, now that is the main point !

By that reasoning, any fight that hasn't happened is a 'fantasy' if the outcome of such fights are being argued about.

Whether you want to label it a 'fantasy' or not. The point is, if we're being objective, reasonable and rational, then the position we take must be of the one that has the most evidence. In this case, the evidence is in the form of FEATS. As such, Golovkin has the feats to suggest he has been the best 160 pound boxer of the last decade. Meanwhile, Floyd Mayweather Jr has 0 feats at 160 pounds. Therefore, the most reasonable conclusion is that the one who is proven with more feats (Golovkin) should be the favorite to win in this match up, given the stipulations.

If you think an elite boxer in their respective division is going to be unable to land anything on Floyd Mayweather Jr, then that's simply delusional! There hasn't been a single boxer that Mayweather was totally untouched against. This isn't fiction where you have fictional characters like Flash that can go untouched. This a real boxing match between two elite boxers inside the boxing ring. Going by your argument, Mayweather would also be able to beat heavyweights too, since there aren't much reasons to assume they would be any more successful in landing punches on Mayweather than Golovkin would?