Originally posted by anthonydavid11
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Name one legit 160 pounder Hagler,Hopkins or Monzon beat better then Jacobs
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by larry GGG View PostAll of their best wins were against fighters moving up...GGG beat a legit top 160 pounder..time to give this man respect
So the argument can be made that Jacobs is better then all their opposition.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Science View PostMonzon never had a good win..Hopkins best win @ 160 was Trinidad, who was a very beatable middleweight...Hagler's best win was Hearns, and that was before got comfortable at middleweight.
So the argument can be made that Jacobs is better then all their opposition.
Comment
-
I don't know much about Monzon. I feel Hagler is bit overrated. and as far as Hopkins he beat Tito. was Tito a "legit" 160 pounder? I say he was, he destroyed WBA champ William Joppy in five rounds who was making his 6th defense of the title. two years later (2003) Joppy goes the distance with Hopkins withstanding a brutal beating.
so Tito was a "legit" MW. and Hopkins schooled and crushed him.
was Tito better than Jacobs? another tough one because I know Danny's movement would give Tito problems but Tito had that equalizer similar to GGG. I think Tito vs Jacobs is a close decision either way.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Science View PostMonzon never had a good win..Hopkins best win @ 160 was Trinidad, who was a very beatable middleweight...Hagler's best win was Hearns, and that was before got comfortable at middleweight.
So the argument can be made that Jacobs is better then all their opposition.
Comment
-
Comment