Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

20 years ago today, His Airness returned in Indianpolis

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    meh....

    mj is ok.

    best player in a weaker, diluted era.

    kobe would have won 8 on those loaded bulls teams.

    Comment


    • #12
      Originally posted by Left Hook Tua View Post
      meh....

      mj is ok.

      best player in a weaker, diluted era.

      kobe would have won 8 on those loaded bulls teams.
      loaded with what? white boys? (buechler, kerr, wennington, longley, kerr, kukoc)

      Comment


      • #13
        Originally posted by MaD vEiN View Post
        loaded with what? white boys? (buechler, kerr, wennington, longley, kerr, kukoc)
        with expansion teams, new salary structures/limits, free agency changes and draft rules.....

        bulls were LOADED for their era.

        do you not realize that?

        don't compare them to the 80's talent (WHEN BULLS DIDN'T WIN ANYWAY)

        bulls got lucky because of pippen.

        pippen signed a weird LONG, LOW contract by mistake and allowed bulls to load up.

        Comment


        • #14
          i just looked it up.

          by bulls 2nd 3peat 1996-1998.

          pippen was the bulls 5th, 6th, 6th highest paid player.

          that is why bulls always loaded with high quality role players, defenders , shooters, rebounders.

          while other teams had either old dudes or scrubs next to their 1-2 stars.

          shiet bulls biggest rival was who the knicks?

          who was their #2 star john starks?

          they were paying anthony mason double pippen.

          Comment


          • #15
            1996

            jordan was #11 and pippen was #20 highest paid salary in the league.

            hmmm bulls must not have spent all that extra money since MAD VEIN says bulls had no other players.

            i wonder why mj decided to play for $4 mill when other stars were getting paid 3-4 times that?

            it can't be to pay for help and role players and stack the team.

            MAD VEIN told me bulls had crappy teammates.

            Comment


            • #16
              Originally posted by Left Hook Tua View Post
              i just looked it up.

              by bulls 2nd 3peat 1996-1998.

              pippen was the bulls 5th, 6th, 6th highest paid player.

              that is why bulls always loaded with high quality role players, defenders , shooters, rebounders.

              while other teams had either old dudes or scrubs next to their 1-2 stars.

              shiet bulls biggest rival was who the knicks?

              who was their #2 star john starks?

              they were paying anthony mason double pippen.
              LOL during their 2nd 3-peat they're probably the oldest team in the NBA in terms of age

              '90s Knicks were the best defensive team during that time so it's no surprise they pose a great challenge. If you try to look closely, Knicks had better role players compared to Bulls both times they met 1st & 2nd 3-peat

              Comment


              • #17
                LOL i never said Bulls have crappy rosters. But they were never THAT great either

                Comment


                • #18
                  Originally posted by MaD vEiN View Post
                  LOL during their 2nd 3-peat they're probably the oldest team in the NBA in terms of age

                  '90s Knicks were the best defensive team during that time so it's no surprise they pose a great challenge. If you try to look closely, Knicks had better role players compared to Bulls both times they met 1st & 2nd 3-peat
                  knicks had nothing but role players.

                  there's a difference between role players that are coming of your bench and role players starting.

                  shiet 2015 lakers have better role players than a lot of teams.

                  problem is they're our starters.

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    Originally posted by MaD vEiN View Post
                    LOL i never said Bulls have crappy rosters. But they were never THAT great either
                    they were loaded for the 90's.

                    it was a weird, transitional era.

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      Originally posted by Left Hook Tua View Post
                      they were loaded for the 90's.

                      it was a weird, transitional era.
                      compared to '90s Lakers? (Van Exel, E.Jones, KObe, Shaq, Ceballos...)

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP