I know many don't like broner but that was no robbery

[IronDanHamza]

It can if the promoters fighter always gets the
benefit of the doubt....

You do realize your disgusting attitude basicaly condones
gift decisions you sh*heel...

You assume that every robbery is due to corruption.

It isn't.

[JJRod]

Its not a surprise last night to see a bunch of sour grapes

Many wanted to see Broner lose but he did enough to beat Granados

He landed the better shots, showed decent defense and closed the fight stronger

Granados did well, deserves a rematch but to call it a robbery is a joke.

If you thought Granados was busier and won, cool but to say robbery is an exaggerating

Of course it was no robbery. It was a close fight with close rounds and Broner got the nod.

[IronDanHamza]

It does most times though doesn't it you jack*ss??




Now your just talking in circles...

Why have you ignored what i said about conflict of intrest??
Is it because it destroys your argument and debunks everything you said??


Name 10 underdogs who in high profile fights actually won a
decision on a rival promoters card against a name???
Lets stick to the last 2 years....

I'm literally talking directly as possible and no it's not necessarily most of the time.

Sometimes it does sometimes it doesn't. I'm not disputing that there is corruption in boxing but a robbery isnt always due to corruption.

You don't seem to understand what a robbery is.

That's a very specific question and a strange one but off the top of my head Badou Jack just had decisions not go his way on a TMT card when he was the favourite. Pre determined decisions? Somehow I doubt it.

In essence you're claiming that the vast majority of fights have pre determined winners.

[therealpugilist]

Of course it was no robbery. It was a close fight with close rounds and Broner got the nod.

to anyone with common sense and 0 biase.....you should've seen all the "Granados got robbed posts.....every close fight seems to be a robbery when the guy they want to lose gets the nod