Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Why Are Some People Ranking Lomachenko Over Crawford??

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    Originally posted by Godsfly View Post
    lomachenko, & most certainly golovkin are not above crawford.

    russell fought bums other then gonzelez.

    how does russell have any better resume then Beltran who broke burns jaw?
    martinez russell walters is better then

    lundy
    burns
    Dulorme
    gamboa
    Beltran
    unified/postol?

    are u on drugs my friend?

    the problem is crawford has put in more work then lomachenko and undoubtedly deserves to be higher.

    and don't get me started on golovkin. lomachenko is higher then golovkin with 7 fights for goodness sakes
    Lundy is an average fighter
    Dulorme is an average fighter
    Beltran is an average fighter
    Burns is an above average fighter
    Gamboa is a good fighter...two weight classes below where Bud fought him
    Postol is a good fighter

    So of those, his best win is Postol. I think wins over Walters, GRJ > Postol

    Win over Martinez > Burns, Beltran

    Lundy and Dulorme are just average wins - nothing great of them. Dulorme definitely at one time was a hot prospect - but he fizzled when it was shown that he has no chin

    Comment


    • #42
      Because in only 7 fight, he beat three A class fighters and is already a two weight class world champion.

      Comment


      • #43
        Originally posted by g27region View Post
        GTFOH with your TC (and Postol) nut licking. I'm stated my opinion, and you start arguing with me only because I've dared to say that Lomachenko's scalps are little bit better, ha ha, it's you who's on TC dick so much that you even start discussion when you hear the opinion different that yours. I wasn't quoting you in the first place, because IDGAF about your opinion or what you think, it's you who started talking to me.



        If Walters is overhyped then Postol is overhyped even more than Walters and I already told the reasons why



        You got it all wrong

        Walters got done beating the hell out of and knocking out p4p fighter

        And Postol got into competitive fight with brawler who never been in p4p list and who injured orbital bone in the proccess.



        The division is ****ed up if former security guard with no amateur boxing experience and 1 good win considered as second best fighter in it



        I have a good memory, I remember all these mother****ers like you who were trying to hype this bum up like he's any kind of threat to Crawford, saying stuff like "Postol is bigger, he might hurt Crawford" like he's some kind of devastating puncher when the mother****er is featherfisted af, and has 41% KO ratio, saying that it's a 50/50 when I've been telling that Postol is a bum since day 1 even before the fight. Here's the proof

        http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/sh...0&postcount=45

        My prediction was right - Crawford dominated Postol and it was far from being competitive. At the end of the day, I was right and all mother****ers like you were wrong because it wasn't 50/50 fight. You'll never learn. Stop watching boxing




        And Postol wasn't running like a scared hoe from Crawford?

        Only beat up injured Matthysse, ha ha, that makes him an elite top fighter of the division and better win, okay
        I'm not reading all this BS, and replying to everything. You wanna know why I'm disagreeing with your dumbass? Not because you have a differing opinion, I could give a **** about that. It's because youre making flat out ******ed statements that you don't even believe in order to suppirt your argument.

        If you just said Loma's higher on the P4P list, cool, whatever. But your dumbass is trying to tell mr GRJ > Gamboa lmao. You're a dumb ****.

        Comment


        • #44
          He white, Crawford ain't

          Comment


          • #45
            Originally posted by JmH Reborn View Post
            Lundy is an average fighter
            Dulorme is an average fighter
            Beltran is an average fighter
            Burns is an above average fighter
            Gamboa is a good fighter...two weight classes below where Bud fought him
            Postol is a good fighter

            So of those, his best win is Postol. I think wins over Walters, GRJ > Postol

            Win over Martinez > Burns, Beltran

            Lundy and Dulorme are just average wins - nothing great of them. Dulorme definitely at one time was a hot prospect - but he fizzled when it was shown that he has no chin
            Except that Burns beat Martinez already - took his "0" in fact.


            I'm not entirely against the point you're making here, though.


            Like I've said - I believe Crawford, right now anyway, has earned more of his due, and deserves to be ranked higher than Loma.

            But skill-wise, Loma has the edge, and the manner in which he's beaten opponents gives credence to him being higher...


            I think Gary Russell will soon prove to be a top fighter in his own right, and that win Loma holds over him will look more, and more impressive.

            Comment


            • #46
              Originally posted by JmH Reborn View Post
              Lundy is an average fighter
              Dulorme is an average fighter
              Beltran is an average fighter
              Burns is an above average fighter
              Gamboa is a good fighter...two weight classes below where Bud fought him
              Postol is a good fighter

              So of those, his best win is Postol. I think wins over Walters, GRJ > Postol

              Win over Martinez > Burns, Beltran

              Lundy and Dulorme are just average wins - nothing great of them. Dulorme definitely at one time was a hot prospect - but he fizzled when it was shown that he has no chin
              Burns beat Martinez lol, and Beltran and Burns had a draw, so Beltran had a draw with the guy that be Martinez, thus both are better than Martinez

              Comment


              • #47
                Simply because he's better to watch. If I had to pick one to watch it would be lomachenko every time. I'm not knocking Crawford who is excellent but, lomachenko has it all.

                Comment


                • #48
                  Originally posted by CatchAndShoot View Post
                  You wanna know why I'm disagreeing
                  No, I don't.

                  Originally posted by CatchAndShoot View Post
                  Not because you have a differing opinion, I could give a **** about that. It's because youre making flat out ******ed statements that you don't even believe in order to suppirt your argument.
                  Originally posted by CatchAndShoot View Post
                  I'm not reading all this BS
                  So how you know if my statements or my arguments are ******ed if you don't even reading my messages? Ha ha

                  Originally posted by CatchAndShoot View Post
                  But your dumbass is trying to tell mr GRJ > Gamboa lmao. You're a dumb ****.
                  No, *****, I've said that Gamboa as a boxer > GRJ. Gamboa is a way better talent

                  But one-sided dominant win over GRJ > close tough fight with smaller Gamboa

                  Don't confuse these things

                  Nice seeing that your ***** ass went silent about Postol being better scalp than Walters
                  Last edited by g27region; 12-04-2016, 08:28 AM.

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    Originally posted by g27region View Post
                    No, I don't.





                    So how you know if my statements or my arguments are ******ed if you don't even reading my messages? Ha ha



                    No, *****, I've said that Gamboa as a boxer > GRJ. Gamboa is a way better talent

                    But one-sided dominant win over GRJ > close tough fight with smaller Gamboa

                    Don't confuse these things
                    Close tough fight? You're a moron.

                    And I was talking about your other ******ed ass posts.

                    Comment


                    • #50
                      Originally posted by CatchAndShoot View Post
                      Close tough fight? You're a moron.

                      And I was talking about your other ******ed ass posts.
                      So you're telling me that Gamboa/Crawford fight wasn't close and competitive before the KO? You're telling me that Gamboa wasn't outboxing Crawford in first rounds?

                      Man, even Crawford saying that it was his toughest fight in career
                      Last edited by g27region; 12-04-2016, 09:03 AM.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP