Spence/Crawford viewership history. 50/50 fair or not?

[sicko]

Count the bundu fight if yiu want. Despite everything basically proving it had nothing to do with spence, knock yourself out, pretend spence was once a superstar but for some reason right afterwards was drawing flies.

Crawford's has consistency. From a fans perspective, where we ignore factions, I would make the spence crawford fight right now, because the winner is bigger going forward. Probably p4p #1 considering their current positions. The big fight i'd look for is the winner of that vs the Thurman vs Pacquiao winner. But if we include the factions, if I was haymon I would do what he's doing, although that's because I dont have that faith in spence, if I was boliodogs i'd put him in there to take crawfords belt, but also it depends on if im trying to monopolise the sport. if I was arum i'd do what he's likely to do, talk sht, make the brook fight, maybe if things get real desperate, feed on a 140lb'er. Prograis is looking to move up soon, and there's sacrificing ramirez, but that's be a last resort, not sure about his fanbase, could be a good event.

Not about Me! I'm just point out how Full of SH#T people are on this forum and how inconsistent they are. People Add or Leave Out stuff to fit their own little narrative

[Wolfie*]

50/50 is fair. Spence or Crawford aren't stars and can't carry a PPV by themselves.

[MDPopescu]

You forgot Spence vs Bundu 6 mil views!!!

... in fact: it averaged 4.8 million viewers, with a peak of 6.34 million.