Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Top Rank On ESPN 2/2 Double Peaks At 1.022 Million Viewers

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Boxing on ESPN is a winner clearly. That was a fight with not even any buzz among boxing fans. That’s impressive numbers indeed.

    Comment


    • #12
      Originally posted by BufordTannen View Post
      People probably expect kov to actually be on espn like I did. That was a terrible idea
      Same, I was so damn confused with them switching back and forth.

      Comment


      • #13
        Makes me realize how much Andre Ward and Feminism were some of the main reasons why HBOBoxing died.
        Last edited by MisanthropicNY; 02-05-2019, 07:41 PM.

        Comment


        • #14
          The APP is not doing well. No body wants to pay $50 a year to split boxing even further. And then have the price go up to PPV rates to make up the profit margins.

          In the end subscribing to all theseindividual apps will cost more than cable and offer less value, flexibility and options.

          Comment


          • #15
            Originally posted by Fire4231 View Post
            The APP is not doing well. No body wants to pay $50 a year to split boxing even further. And then have the price go up to PPV rates to make up the profit margins.

            In the end subscribing to all theseindividual apps will cost more than cable and offer less value, flexibility and options.
            they already have over 2million subscribers on espn+

            Comment


            • #16
              This was a significant fight between two of the top
              light heavyweights, and boxing fans should have been
              excited about it. Thurman drew significantly more on FOX
              while fighting a fringe contender.
              Don't believe the hype.
              ESPN and top Rank are a desolate sinking ship.
              Top Rank has backed themselves into a corner, and they
              cannot manufacture what appear to be quality opponents
              for their stars fast enough. Except at 175-lbs,
              They got nobody for their biggest names to face.
              Is anybody in their right mind interested in paying to see
              Crawford destroy Khan on PPV?
              That should be included with your $5 ESPN+ subscription.

              Comment


              • #17
                Originally posted by Oldskoolg View Post
                Boxing on ESPN is a winner clearly. That was a fight with not even any buzz among boxing fans. That’s impressive numbers indeed.
                Boxing has a real good shot at approaching another golden age if promoters and networks can work out fights. Honestly, with ESPN, DAZN (which I sold short and am glad I was wrong about), and the PBC on Fox and Showtime, the eyeballs watching boxing are sky high. The only thing that could slow things down are top fights not happening.

                Comment


                • #18
                  Originally posted by Lemonhead_Jeff View Post
                  This was a significant fight between two of the top
                  light heavyweights, and boxing fans should have been
                  excited about it. Thurman drew significantly more on FOX
                  while fighting a fringe contender.
                  Don't believe the hype.
                  ESPN and top Rank are a desolate sinking ship.
                  Top Rank has backed themselves into a corner, and they
                  cannot manufacture what appear to be quality opponents
                  for their stars fast enough. Except at 175-lbs,
                  They got nobody for their biggest names to face.
                  Is anybody in their right mind interested in paying to see
                  Crawford destroy Khan on PPV?
                  That should be included with your $5 ESPN+ subscription.

                  To your first point, broadcast TV still has WAY more available free outlets and access than ESPN on cable/satellite does, so that is not quite an apples to apples comparison. That 1 million viewership is great for ESPN, and they are probably giddy.

                  Your second point? Sweet Mother there is no way I could agree more. That fight screams ESPN.

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    Originally posted by landotter View Post
                    To your first point, broadcast TV still has WAY more available free outlets and access than ESPN on cable/satellite does, so that is not quite an apples to apples comparison. That 1 million viewership is great for ESPN, and they are probably giddy.

                    Your second point? Sweet Mother there is no way I could agree more. That fight screams ESPN.
                    1 million would be good for premium cable like HBO or Showtime.

                    ESPN is regular cable and should have gotten higher ratings.

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      Originally posted by Phenom View Post
                      Imagine how many more people would watch if they didn't switch back and forth between ESPN and +
                      Exactly, they couldn't have made it anymore confusing and nothing on the broadcast did anything to make it any clearer.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP