Originally posted by Ray Corso
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Mike Tyson: Deontay Wilder Could Beat Me? I Don't Think So!
Collapse
-
-
Tyson was knocking out grown men that stood 6'5", 6'6", and outweighed him by 30-40 lbs. Wilder would have been easy work. He has never fought anyone on the level of a prime Tyson.
Comment
-
Originally posted by CLUBBER! View PostRhonda Rousey also believed she was invincible until reality struckOriginally posted by yoshik View PostI fear (and celebrate) that Deyonce has lost his mind. This is certification. This also tells me Deyonce is distracted and won't be able to focus on Ortiz and he will try to crush him and wind up lights out.
Comment
-
"Me vs Tyson in 86, I'd kick the hell outta that guy”... This is getting embarrassing now. 86 Tyson was a absolute beast. Why does Wilder need to keep bringing up Tyson?? Is it because he knows he can never fight him and be proved wrong?
Wilder better make light work of Ortiz or else his comments will backfire and make him look like an even bigger mug.
Comment
-
Now, Tyson talks. Why wait so long? Who exactly has he fought that fights like Wilder? None. Not sure there is anyone in the history of heavyweights who fights like Wilder - clumsy, rangy, athletic, long and with God-given power. Further, Tyson lost in his prime at 24 to Douglas. So, what exactly is this hype about his prime?
Anyone can be beat in the heavyweight - however, all the main advantages are with Wilder save for the Tyson uppercut and power in the left. In the right hand, Wilder has more power. For Tyson to throw the uppercut, Wilder would have to be too wild and Tyson will have to be close.
Wilder fights to the level of his opposition. I see him destroying Tyson easily. Haters gonna hate - but too many physical advantages for Wilder which Tyson records shows he struggles with.
Comment
-
Lol, man this guy is coocoo for cocoa puffs. He has a seriously skilled boxer in front of him. If he overlooked Ortiz he is going to be made a fool of.
Comment
Comment