So there is a huge argument going on at another forum that broke out after yersterdays life and death tennis match between Djokovic and Federer.
People are saying that professional tennis is more physically and mentally demanding than professional boxing. They were stating that the players go through absolute insane lengths to win the wimbledon and any other significant tournament and the players take a lot of punishment by playing a match every single day in tournaments and they take a lot of falls chasing down balls and bruising their bones in the process, so a lot of them have come to the conclusion that tennis is more physically and mentally demanding than boxing.
But how can you actually argue with a sport like boxing?
People are saying that professional tennis is more physically and mentally demanding than professional boxing. They were stating that the players go through absolute insane lengths to win the wimbledon and any other significant tournament and the players take a lot of punishment by playing a match every single day in tournaments and they take a lot of falls chasing down balls and bruising their bones in the process, so a lot of them have come to the conclusion that tennis is more physically and mentally demanding than boxing.
But how can you actually argue with a sport like boxing?
Comment