Originally posted by Rome-By-Ko
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Is a win for kell brook better than any of khans wins?
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by -Kev- View PostKhan has fought the better fighters from a very young age though, so it's understandable that he is not undefeated.
Prescott, Kotelnyk, Malignaggi, Maidana, Judah, Peterson, Garcia.
Earl, Gomez, Limond were about as good a win as Brook's current best win over Carson Jones IMHO.
if Kell has an opponent/stepping stone on his record of equivalent worth to those guys, Michael Jennings would be somewhat closer to a match.
Jones is a prime guy who had shown a lot of improvement after teaming with Sanchez and coming down to welter, climbing the sanctioning body's rankings. he's yet to prove he's more than a gatekeeper to world class, but he was certainly a more formidable opponent than those you mentioned for Khan.Last edited by S. Saddler 1310; 01-18-2013, 02:01 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by bojangles1987 View PostI don't care about belts, I care about who they beat. Alexander is not any better a win than Kotelnik or Maidana were for Khan. Maybe Alexander recovers from a Brook loss and goes on to do something to change that, but at the moment that's how I feel.
Comment
-
all things considered, yes, Devon would be the best single win Khan and Kell would have between them. you can come up with favourable triangulations involving Alexander for both Khan and Devon (Khan handled Kotelnik whom Devon struggled with and should've lost to, Devon handled Maidana more easily than Khan), but the truth is he would be the most accomplished fighter that either Khan or Kell would have beaten.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Rome-By-Ko View PostRespect ya view bro,but let's be real..Fighters are looked at for accomplishments as they should be..Since you want to look at who they beat,that still gives Alexander an edge bro...Alexander beat Matt's Kottie Maidana Urango and Bailey..Maidana and Kottie have nothing on their resume that good,so weather it's belts or just resume Alexander trumps both of them bro..Based off of facts...
Comment
-
Originally posted by bojangles1987 View PostI simply refuse to give credit to Alexander for Matthysse or Kotelnik. He did not beat either of them, and I don't care what the record says. Kotelnik and Maidana were the same caliber fighter as Alexander now.Originally posted by S. Saddler 1310 View Postall things considered, yes, Devon would be the best single win Khan and Kell would have between them. you can come up with favourable triangulations involving Alexander for both Khan and Devon (Khan handled Kotelnik whom Devon struggled with and should've lost to, Devon handled Maidana more easily than Khan), but the truth is he would be the most accomplished fighter that either Khan or Kell would have beaten.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Pan-Africanist View PostIt depends on how he beats Devon. If he dominates the fight and wins convincingly than hes on his way to becoming a player in the WW division. If he wins a stinker than obviously there will still be question marks.
Comment
Comment