The Ring Magazine has become a ****ing joke

[hugh grant]

The problem you should have is that manny remains highly ranked even though he lost to jmm and beat tim (unofficially) or beat jmm and lost to tim (officially). Seems ring is only keeping manny there because gbp gets a percentage of manny's fights. I mean how many more blown up jww can a ww fight and not get called on it?

At some point ring should review its rankings and realize that either floyd-champ at ww and jmw or ward-super six beat chad- are the only 2 choices for p4p #1 right now. Having manny at #2 given his last few fights lacks credibility.

You go off on a tangent, but Pac has only been taken close in a fight against JMM in 8 years. Just cos JMM is Pacs kryponite dont mean he shouldnt be no1.

He fights regularly as well, fighting the best fighters in the world availabel. What has floyd done that makes him level to Pac recently? BH should feel hard done by as he outclassed Pavlik and Tarver as an old man but dont get no2 billing like floyd preferential treatment mayweather does.

JMM took Pac close, but then again hes a better fighter than Cotto and SSM, and hes Pacs kryptonite which Pac cant be penalized against. Floyd probably has a kryptonite opponent as well, but he wont fight anyone for us to find out who it is.

What Pac done in the other 7 years counts. What has Floyd done recently? Beating Cotto and SSM isnt anything to boast about for top honours. BH is a better fighter than fLOYD as he hasnt got FLoyds speed and youth but still takes on opponents that floyd wont. BH would have jumped at the chance to fight Sergio, yet Floyd is hesitant. If floyd doubts his own skills why should Ring mag rate them?

[Frank Ducketts]

Source? ............

What's next, BoxingScene only has him at #2 because they get a percentage of his fights too?

Puga, you couldn't hide your alter ego better than this?