Originally posted by Pan-Africanist
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Eddie Hearn let Kell Brook into the ring, but refused to let Wilder into the ring
Collapse
-
Originally posted by Pan-Africanist View PostThey can control Kell Brook. There’s no controlling Wilder so it’s a risk .
Wilder would have sold the event for a fight with AJ he would have promoted it and it would have got people hyped.
Comment
-
Originally posted by TysonFuryTBE View PostEddie Hearn happily let Kell Brook into the ring after the Amir Khan fight but flat out REFUSED to let wilder get into the ring after the AJ fight, if I remember correctly Eddie was saying something about class and respect and how getting into the ring after the fight isn't respectful.
So why he let Kell brook into the ring......because he wants to make that fight
Why he refuse to let wilder into the ring........because he don't want to make that fight.
Eddie Hearn EXPOSED
This is a great point. Funny watching guys spin it or just come back with insults when they know you are 100% right.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Motorcity Cobra View PostHearn was ok with Wilder coming into the ring until Joshua started whining like a baby. Joshua was the one who had a problem with it then Hearn took AJ's side
For the record, I think AJ has trouble in interviews and would look absolutely shook in front of Wilder and I think that's why they wouldn't let Wider in.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Redd Foxx View PostI'm not challenging you on this, just wondering you if you have any source. Because, I'd like to throw it in these pro-uk dorks faces the next time they puff their chests about this shyt.
For the record, I think AJ has trouble in interviews and would look absolutely shook in front of Wilder and I think that's why they wouldn't let Wider in.
Comment
-
Comment