Canelo via KO. Alcime and Rubio beat Lemieux.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
"Canelo" Alvarez vs "LeMule" @ 160 lbs / 11 Stone 6: Who wins?
Collapse
-
-
-
Look at all the #48 bandwagoners again now favoring Lemieux to beat Alvarez, same guys that said Liam Smith was too much for Alvarez.
In boxing it's called "Alvarez has better fundamentals than Lemieux."
Comment
-
Originally posted by bigdramashow View Posti'd favour lemiuex, too much power at 160 and skillwise canelo isnt lightyears ahead of him. Canelo gets exposed fighting someone whos actually similar size to him, simple as that
Comment
-
Originally posted by SugarKaineHook View PostLook at all the #48 bandwagoners again now favoring Lemieux to beat Alvarez, same guys that said Liam Smith was too much for Alvarez.
In boxing it's called "Alvarez has better fundamentals than Lemieux."
Comment
-
Originally posted by bigdramashow View Postnever said liam smith would be too much. Lemiuexs a top middleweight, amusing how hes suddenly considered a bum now he lost to GGG. Canelos not fought fighters his own size, lemiuex way too powerful
Comment
-
Originally posted by SugarKaineHook View PostWho says LeMule was bum? Angulo demolished Rosado in 2 rounds? Rubio and Alcine beat Lemeiux?
Comment
-
Originally posted by bigdramashow View Posthes improved since then mate. Khan lost to prescott but he beat maidana, crolla lost to matthews but became world champ, fighters can improve you know...
Comment
-
Originally posted by bigdramashow View Posthes improved since then mate. Khan lost to prescott but he beat maidana, crolla lost to matthews but became world champ, fighters can improve you know...
Khan never really improved, he has a glass chin and can fall against any opponent, he got lucky against Maidana, he barely survived, that was heart not skill that got him that win.
Not all losses a fighter takes are due to incomplete development, youth, or lack of experience. Sometimes that's the case, but that's also an easy excuse for losses that have nothing to do with such reasoning.
Comment
Comment