Just curious? Why do people generally consider Duran to rank higher than SRL pound for pound? I mean I'm a fan of both but Leonard's resume is pretty untouchable.
Well, he was the smaller, older, former lightweight and the only fighter to beat prime Leonard, when younger, bigger, prime ATG fighters like Hearns, Benitez and Hagler couldn't. Think about that for a moment.
He'd been fighting for a decade before all of those guys reached their prime and moved up from super bantamweight before becoming lightweight champ and then beating Leonard.
Despite fighting those guys and being famous as part of that group, he's still not of their generation. He's of the generation before and was the fighter of the decade for the 70's as a lightweight, not the 80's as a welterweight and middleweight.
He got a gift in the Hearns rematch and the third Duran fight was a joke. His win over Hagler is still disputed to this day. Not trying to bash Leonard, I like and respect him, but I think Duran's legacy is more impressive and his fighting style was more entertaining. He didn't try to steal rounds by waiting to fight in the last 30 seconds.
Do you realize what you just did?? You deliberately failed to mention that Leonard stopped Hearns and made Duran quit.
Comment