Where to start? This "smh", which seems to occupy 90% of NSB posts these days. I'm so behind the times with "textspeak", I kept thinking people were referring to the Sydney Morning Herald. How does posting textspeak and catchphrases constitute discussion?
"Did you see last night's fight? Anyone got take on the way feints were used to set up the main offence?"
"smh, lol, psml, smh, smh."
But check this thread, a new low of ******ation:
http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/sh...d.php?t=626483
A thread asking if Roy Jones Jr. is in the top 20 all-time great lists, a thread with replies so idiotic that The REED (TM) is one of the naysayers. Apparently wins over John Ruiz and his first bout against Tarver (the one where his chin got shook and he looked lucky to get the nod from the judges) are ones for the "plus" column. The naysayers are mentioning fighters before 1990... the ones saying Roy is top 10 ATG are the ones who haven't even HEARD of fighters before 1990.
smh.
"Did you see last night's fight? Anyone got take on the way feints were used to set up the main offence?"
"smh, lol, psml, smh, smh."
But check this thread, a new low of ******ation:
http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/sh...d.php?t=626483
A thread asking if Roy Jones Jr. is in the top 20 all-time great lists, a thread with replies so idiotic that The REED (TM) is one of the naysayers. Apparently wins over John Ruiz and his first bout against Tarver (the one where his chin got shook and he looked lucky to get the nod from the judges) are ones for the "plus" column. The naysayers are mentioning fighters before 1990... the ones saying Roy is top 10 ATG are the ones who haven't even HEARD of fighters before 1990.
smh.
Comment