Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Ecuador says UK has given ‘guarantees’ for Assange to leave embassy

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Ecuador says UK has given ‘guarantees’ for Assange to leave embassy

    https://www.theguardian.com/media/20...-leave-embassy

    President Lenín Moreno said Ecuador has received written assurances UK would not extradite Assange to face death penalty


    Dan Collyns in Quito and Patrick Wintour in London

    Thu 6 Dec 2018 18.53 GMT
    Last modified on Thu 6 Dec 2018 19.59 GMT


    Ecuador has received written assurances from the UK government that it would not to extradite Julian Assange to any country where he would face the death penalty, the country’s president, Lenín Moreno, has said.

    In a live radio interview on Thursday, Moreno said that the WikiLeaks founder now had sufficient guarantees to leave Ecuador’s embassy in the UK, where he has lived under asylum since mid-2012.

    Moreno told journalists he was talking to the UK government so it would “guarantee his life, and guarantee he wouldn’t be extradited to any country where his life would be in danger”. He added the UK would require Assange to complete a short jail term for breaching bail conditions.

    The announcement comes as speculation mounts that the Australian activist’s six-year stay in the London embassy could be coming to a close. The appointment of a new ambassador, Jaime Marchán, in the London embassy this week is a sign that the government wants to resolve the problem, according to analysts in Quito.

    Pressure has been mounting on the WikiLeaks founder since Ecuador cut his internet connection in March and the Guardian reported that the country had spent millions on his extended stay.

    “I don’t like Mr Julian Assange’s presence in Ecuador’s embassy,” Moreno said on Thursday, without saying the activist would be forced out. He added that the Australian had spent “too much time almost imprisoned” in the country’s embassy.

    Opinion polls show most Ecuadorians want Assange to leave the embassy, and Moreno is under pressure at home and from the US to end the unwanted house guest’s stay.

    “Ecuadorians have a long tradition of respect for human rights,” Fabricio Villamar, an MP for the opposition Creo party, told the Guardian.

    “But that tradition cannot be interpreted as a weakness or as a loophole for people who are being pursued by ordinary justice,” he added.

    In October, Ecuador imposed stringent new house rules for Assange to which he responded with an action against the embassy for “violating his fundamental rights and freedoms”. An Ecuadorian judge rejected the legal move.

    US authorities have never officially confirmed that they have charged Assange, but last month a mistake in a document filed in an unrelated case hinted that criminal charges may have been prepared in secret.

    The court filing, submitted apparently in error by US prosecutors, mentioned criminal charges against someone named “Assange” even though that was not the name of the defendant.

    Legal analysts said the error was likely to have been caused by prosecutors copying and pasting from sealed documents outlining charges against the WikiLeaks founder.

    The Foreign Office did not deny a previous news report last month suggesting the Home Office had given written assurances to the Ecuadorian government that UK ministers would not allow Assange’s extradition to a country where he would face the death penalty.

    It is not clear if this assurance amounts to a commitment that the UK will not allow Assange’s extradition to the US at all – or whether it would allow extradition on condition that he would not face the death penalty.

    It is understood that the UK has also given assurances that Assange would not face more than six months in jail for related bail offences.

    Earlier this year, the Foreign Office minister, Alan Duncan, tried to reassure Assange about his treatment if he chose to leave the embassy, telling MPs: “We are increasingly concerned about his health.

    “It is our wish that this is brought to an end, and we would like to make the assurance that if he were to step out of the embassy, he would be treated humanely and properly. The first priority would be to look after his health, which we think is deteriorating.”
    Last edited by jaded; 12-06-2018, 03:35 PM.

  • #2
    In other words--they are doing everything they can to keep him off the Clinton Body Count.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by GhostofDempsey View Post
      In other words--they are doing everything they can to keep him off the Clinton Body Count.
      Exactly.

      If they throw him out, he's gonna shoot to the top of those Celebrity Death Pools.

      Comment


      • #4
        It's not clear though what happens after (if) he serves his short prison sentence. No extradition to "any country where he would face the death penalty"...but if their are guarantees of no death penalty does he become fair game for extradition? I know Ecuador gave him citizenship but I doubt Lenin Moreno wants any more to do with him.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by jaded View Post
          https://www.theguardian.com/media/20...-leave-embassy

          President Lenín Moreno said Ecuador has received written assurances UK would not extradite Assange to face death penalty


          Dan Collyns in Quito and Patrick Wintour in London

          Thu 6 Dec 2018 18.53 GMT
          Last modified on Thu 6 Dec 2018 19.59 GMT


          Ecuador has received written assurances from the UK government that it would not to extradite Julian Assange to any country where he would face the death penalty, the country’s president, Lenín Moreno, has said.

          In a live radio interview on Thursday, Moreno said that the WikiLeaks founder now had sufficient guarantees to leave Ecuador’s embassy in the UK, where he has lived under asylum since mid-2012.

          Moreno told journalists he was talking to the UK government so it would “guarantee his life, and guarantee he wouldn’t be extradited to any country where his life would be in danger”. He added the UK would require Assange to complete a short jail term for breaching bail conditions.

          The announcement comes as speculation mounts that the Australian activist’s six-year stay in the London embassy could be coming to a close. The appointment of a new ambassador, Jaime Marchán, in the London embassy this week is a sign that the government wants to resolve the problem, according to analysts in Quito.

          Pressure has been mounting on the WikiLeaks founder since Ecuador cut his internet connection in March and the Guardian reported that the country had spent millions on his extended stay.

          “I don’t like Mr Julian Assange’s presence in Ecuador’s embassy,” Moreno said on Thursday, without saying the activist would be forced out. He added that the Australian had spent “too much time almost imprisoned” in the country’s embassy.

          Opinion polls show most Ecuadorians want Assange to leave the embassy, and Moreno is under pressure at home and from the US to end the unwanted house guest’s stay.

          “Ecuadorians have a long tradition of respect for human rights,” Fabricio Villamar, an MP for the opposition Creo party, told the Guardian.

          “But that tradition cannot be interpreted as a weakness or as a loophole for people who are being pursued by ordinary justice,” he added.

          In October, Ecuador imposed stringent new house rules for Assange to which he responded with an action against the embassy for “violating his fundamental rights and freedoms”. An Ecuadorian judge rejected the legal move.

          US authorities have never officially confirmed that they have charged Assange, but last month a mistake in a document filed in an unrelated case hinted that criminal charges may have been prepared in secret.

          The court filing, submitted apparently in error by US prosecutors, mentioned criminal charges against someone named “Assange” even though that was not the name of the defendant.

          Legal analysts said the error was likely to have been caused by prosecutors copying and pasting from sealed documents outlining charges against the WikiLeaks founder.

          The Foreign Office did not deny a previous news report last month suggesting the Home Office had given written assurances to the Ecuadorian government that UK ministers would not allow Assange’s extradition to a country where he would face the death penalty.

          It is not clear if this assurance amounts to a commitment that the UK will not allow Assange’s extradition to the US at all – or whether it would allow extradition on condition that he would not face the death penalty.

          It is understood that the UK has also given assurances that Assange would not face more than six months in jail for related bail offences.

          Earlier this year, the Foreign Office minister, Alan Duncan, tried to reassure Assange about his treatment if he chose to leave the embassy, telling MPs: “We are increasingly concerned about his health.

          “It is our wish that this is brought to an end, and we would like to make the assurance that if he were to step out of the embassy, he would be treated humanely and properly. The first priority would be to look after his health, which we think is deteriorating.”
          Why would they kill assange?

          I guess they don’t like their secrets being told

          Comment


          • #6
            They guarantee he'll make it out of the embassy....with two holes in his skull?

            Either way I guess if I was Assange I'd just be ready to get it over with. Life in an embassy has to suck ass so just let me get on my way or kill me already.

            Comment


            • #7
              To be fair it's an entire sheet show. Sweden dropped the charges bit by bit. It's all dodgy as hell.

              Fair play he's out waited several parties. If he was guilty of one of those crimes he's done 6 years already.

              He exposed truth. Fack sake.

              Comment


              • #8
                Julian Assange charges: everything you need to know

                https://www.theguardian.com/media/20...en-prepared-us

                What is WikiLeaks founder potentially being charged with, and what could happen next?


                Esther Addley

                Fri 16 Nov 2018 13.32 GMT
                Last modified on Fri 16 Nov 2018 16.50 GMT


                How do we know Julian Assange has been charged by the US?

                We don’t know for sure. But a mistake in a document filed by the US authorities in an unrelated case hints that criminal charges may have been prepared in secret.

                What happened?

                The text of the court filing, which relates to a completely separate case, includes two mentions of someone called Assange, including a suggestion that the documentation in the case “would need to remain sealed until Assange is arrested in connection with the charges”.

                The filing was a motion to seal the charges, meaning they would be kept secret, because “due to the sophistication of the defendant and the publicity around the case, no other procedure is likely to keep confidential the fact that Assange has been charged”.

                Why is his name included?

                A justice department spokesman would say only that the court filing was “made in error” and that Assange was “not the intended name for this filing”. But legal experts suggested the mistake was made by lawyers copying and pasting text from one document to another, and forgetting to change the name and other details.

                What is Assange potentially being charged with?

                Again, we don’t know. The US authorities have been investigating the WikiLeaks founder since at least 2011, when a grand jury hearing was opened into the whistleblowing website’s publication the previous year of hundreds of thousands of US diplomatic cables, in conjunction with a number of international newspapers including the Guardian.

                WikiLeaks is also under investigation by Robert Mueller, the US special counsel, for publishing a cache of hacked emails from the Democratic party during the 2016 presidential campaign.

                The assumption is that any potential charges would be likely to be brought under the US Espionage Act, the same legislation used in the unsuccessful attempt to prosecute Daniel Ellsberg over the Pentagon Papers in 1971.

                Any other evidence?

                Separately on Thursday, the Wall Street Journal reported that the justice department was preparing to prosecute Assange, and had considered several charges against him, and was increasingly confident it would be able to secure his extradition.

                Haven’t they told Assange himself?

                No. “The news that criminal charges have apparently been filed against Mr Assange is even more troubling than the haphazard manner in which that information has been revealed,” his US lawyer, Barry Pollack, said, adding that a government bringing criminal charges against someone for publishing truthful information was a “dangerous path for a democracy to take”.

                What does this mean for Assange?


                Assange remains at the Ecuadorean embassy in London, where he was granted asylum in 2012. An attempt by Sweden to extradite him over allegations of rape and sexual assault foundered last year when prosecutors said they saw no realistic way of proceeding, but he and his supporters have always maintained that he sought asylum in order to avoid extradition to the US. Ecuador has so far resisted attempts to extradite him.

                However relations between the WikiLeaks founder and his hosts have deteriorated sharply since last year’s election of President Lenin Moreno, who has previously described Assange as a “stone in the shoe”. Earlier this year Moreno said Assange could stay as long as he agreed to certain conditions, including not intervening in foreign politics, but that the country would “take a decision” if he did not comply.

                The country’s former president Rafael Correa said Moreno would “throw [Assange] out of the embassy at the first pressure from the United States”. Assange is currently suing his hosts, arguing that the conditions of his stay violate his “fundamental freedoms”.

                What happens next?


                Again, it is not clear. We don’t know if the US has already filed an extradition request against Assange with the UK. However the Metropolitan police have previously said he would face immediate arrest if he left the embassy for breaching the terms of his bail conditions when he sought asylum.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by bigjavi973 View Post
                  Why would they kill assange?

                  I guess they don’t like their secrets being told
                  I don't think they want to kill him. I'm pretty sure what they are doing is arranging for his arrest for the bail violation so that the UK police can walk in the Ecuadorian Embassy...incarcerate him and very quickly hand him over to the US so that Mueller can turn the screws on him looking for something/anything that he can go after Trump with and somehow establish or attempt to establish Russian collusion. He will become the next to be offered some kind of plea bargain.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Julian Assange has been dead for over five years

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP