Originally posted by No Ceilings
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
After Reaching The Elite Level, Is It Ok To Take On A Fighter Coming Off A Loss?
Collapse
-
Originally posted by COACH-WEBB View PostYea, my post was dead on. 25 did this to knock one fighter, yet overlook when another fighter does it. Agenda.
Comment
-
Originally posted by 2501 View Postwhen a fighter reaches the elite level, is it ok for them to take on a fighter who was decisively beaten in their previous fight?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Spray_resistant View PostAlso its just not that simple either as to whether its ok to fight a guy off of a loss once you are viewed as the best of the best.
Why does everyone try and turn everything into some black/white polar extreme situation on this board.
Its like being forced to think about variables is frightening to posters on here.
Pac is a guy who could easily make 140 and probably still make 135 with a struggle him fighting a decent WW off of a ko loss before the Cotto fight would have been a fine test to me.
Comment
-
It's not black and white, I think its ok at the elite level to face someone coming off a close loss against other elite fighter.
However, if you facing a elite or non elite fighter coming off a less than spectacular loss then.
For example, Tarver facing Hopkins after a close loss to Taylor would be acceptable since Hopkins was past prime and facing a very close loss against a percieved MW elite at the time, whereas there is a clear difference between Judah losing to Baldomir because Baldomir was always a limited guy who was never an elite fighter.
Comment
-
-
Pacquiao:
Fought Barrera after Barrera lost to Marquez.
Fought Morales I after Morales lost to Barrera and still lost.
Fought Morales again after Morales lost to Raheem.
Fought Morales again after already beating Morales.
Fought Larios after Larios lost to Israel Vazquez.
Fought Clottey after Clottey lost a close dec to Cotto.
So is this thread aimed at Pacquiao or who???
LOL.
Comment
-
Comment