IT still amazes me how many people on this forum (I don’t really see it anywhere else) think Joshua is in anyway ducking wilder.
Joshua in around four years has fought numerous unbeaten fighters, became one of the youngest (in terms of fights) champions ever, beat other top10 contenders including quite arguably the best hw boxer of the last ten years; and is in line to have a second unification fight - all in such a short period.
Wilder on the other hand has had twice the fights with only really stiverne (1st time) you could even have an argument was of a world class level.
Put simply, Joshua hasn’t had time to duck anyone yet - when he fights two or three fringe fighters in a row you can argue it - but let’s say husband fights after Parker were Potvetkin, David Haye, Dillian Whyte and Tyson Fury - by the end of 2019 I still don’t think I could argue he’s ducking , he will just have taken on bigger fights in terms of popularity and financial pay-off. That’s not to say that will happen of course.
I think you can claim Joshua is ‘ducking’ if he ends up fighting (excluding mandatories) a three fight combo of say Pulev, Ortiz and Miller - something like that, until then the resume speaks for itself. Any one of them individually would be ok in my view though.
Both wilder and Joshua know there is more money in this fight when it’s build some more; it doesn’t matter from a uk side but in America both Joshua and wilder can be built up which regardless of split will increase both revenues. Until then the only way this fight happens is if 1) wilder reduces his % similar fashion to Parker 2) joshua is still willing to take a pay cut to continue his ‘legacy’
For clarification also - the reason financially he will get more from others is either the fight sells bigger and/or he will get a more higher split
Joshua in around four years has fought numerous unbeaten fighters, became one of the youngest (in terms of fights) champions ever, beat other top10 contenders including quite arguably the best hw boxer of the last ten years; and is in line to have a second unification fight - all in such a short period.
Wilder on the other hand has had twice the fights with only really stiverne (1st time) you could even have an argument was of a world class level.
Put simply, Joshua hasn’t had time to duck anyone yet - when he fights two or three fringe fighters in a row you can argue it - but let’s say husband fights after Parker were Potvetkin, David Haye, Dillian Whyte and Tyson Fury - by the end of 2019 I still don’t think I could argue he’s ducking , he will just have taken on bigger fights in terms of popularity and financial pay-off. That’s not to say that will happen of course.
I think you can claim Joshua is ‘ducking’ if he ends up fighting (excluding mandatories) a three fight combo of say Pulev, Ortiz and Miller - something like that, until then the resume speaks for itself. Any one of them individually would be ok in my view though.
Both wilder and Joshua know there is more money in this fight when it’s build some more; it doesn’t matter from a uk side but in America both Joshua and wilder can be built up which regardless of split will increase both revenues. Until then the only way this fight happens is if 1) wilder reduces his % similar fashion to Parker 2) joshua is still willing to take a pay cut to continue his ‘legacy’
For clarification also - the reason financially he will get more from others is either the fight sells bigger and/or he will get a more higher split
Comment