Why are you guys so high on Diego Corrales?

[Larry the boss]

So orginially you tried to claim that Corrales wasn't P4P top 10 at all.

Now after you've been provided with evidence that he was P4P #5 when Floyd fought him you have come out with this backwards bat**** theory that the P4P list has only counted for the last 10 years.

Bull-****.

yep, he got owned and tried to move the goal post

[Larry the boss]

No it wasn't. You are talking ****!! Literally pure ****.

The P4P Top 10 has been emphasized for decades. It hasn't been any more emphasized "in the last 10 years" than it ever has.

Why try it? It's never going to work when there are people like myself who have been following boxing before P4P lists even existed.

You tried to claim Corrales wasn't top 10 and when you got proven wrong you've tried to pull this mind boggling claim out of thin air.

Please just stop.

dont forget he tried to say it was a BoxRec p4p list, then when that proved wrong he said P4P didnt matter before the last 10 years..lol

[IronDanHamza]

Dude you are the one talking major bull****. Dude top 10 p4p list pre-2000 was way more subjective and less emphasized than who was just plain number 1 p4p. Thats is fact dude.

Dude dont try and pull this bull**** like you some know it all. Because ive followed boxing religiously since '81. And i know people didnt put much emphasis on who is top 10 p4p.

And yes the top 10 p4p was way more subjective back then than it is now. You know why? ACCESS. People these days have way more access to fighters and who they are and how they fight than back then. That is fact and that the reason why back then a top 10 p4p ranking would be way more subjective.

Try all you want and say top 10 p4p was just a big and just as relevant back then as it is now but that is utter bull****.

You can repeat it as much as you want but you are talking nonsense and anyone who followed the sport then knows it.

You are digging yourself into a hole and it's only getting deeper.

It is not emphasized now any more than it ever has been. Simple as that.

P4P lists are what they are. Being #5 P4P today is no different than being #5 P4P in 2000 or any more year. To try and claim it is because you were proved wrong about Corrales is hilarious.

[IronDanHamza]

dont forget he tried to say it was a BoxRec p4p list, then when that proved wrong he said P4P didnt matter before the last 10 years..lol

[DeadLikeMe]

So orginially you tried to claim that Corrales wasn't P4P top 10 at all.

Now after you've been provided with evidence that he was P4P #5 when Floyd fought him you have come out with this backwards bat**** theory that the P4P list has only counted for the last 10 years.

Bull-****.

Everyone knows pacman invented boxing in 2008.

[boxinghead530]

You can repeat it as much as you want but you are talking nonsense and anyone who followed the sport then knows it.

You are digging yourself into a hole and it's only getting deeper.

It is not emphasized now any more than it ever has been. Simple as that.

P4P lists are what they are. Being #5 P4P today is no different than being #5 P4P in 2000 or any more year. To try and claim it is because you were proved wrong about Corrales is hilarious.

Look dude you can think all you want that top 10 p4p was just as much emphasized as much back then as i was now. But it wasnt. Plus is was way more subjective back then because of access.

Look dude you believe what you want and ill believe the truth.

[MONGOOSE66]

Dude had the body dimensions of a BIG welterweight and fought at 130. Just that alone was intimidating. Most "fans" don't get that. Never been in the ring. He literally walked in there with NO fear of anyone. He stalked you like prey. Only elite speed guys had a chance. He hit like a horse at 130. He rarely threw STRAIGHT punches. Everything was a hook. The dude was a monster. I always wondered why he never threw straight punches, cause if he did. He'd of been tuff to touch.
He had the mentality of King Kong. No boxing IQ. Just a pure pressure/power guy.

[boxinghead530]

Oh, well if you put it that way I really don't think you're very old.

Started following the sport recently, have you?

Well yea, ive only followed it since '81 so yea that seems pretty recent.

[boxinghead530]

yep, he got owned and tried to move the goal post

Where was i owned at and where did i move the goal post?

As hard as that may be for you explain.

[soul_survivor]

when you have a resume with ancient Mosley, dodgy win over Castillo, close fight over Hatton, rubbish fight against Pac and a longer list of names NOT FOUGHT...then you kinda have to bring up guys like Corrales

look at Pacs resume, you can mention Barrera, MOrales, JMM, Bradley, Cotto andn ot even go to his second tier or 3rd tier wins