Originally posted by batista84
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Crawford: I'm Better Than Anyone Amir Khan Has Ever Faced
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by BlackSoul View Postthese idiot in the comment section are sayin' Bud fight canelo(who is also a steroid cheat) but just fought at 168 but if thats the case then canelo needs to fight a fighter 3 weight classes above him as well then since thats the standard which would be heavyweight, fight a heavyweight version of luis ortiz then to these stupid ass idiots in the comment thread.
P4P if they were around the same size we ALL know canelo would get outboxed like he lost ALL 12 rounds to mayweather
We are talking about Canelo fighting Khan at 155 1lb above the next class up from Crawford. Crawford and Khan both fought 140-147. Crawford just moved up over the last year and a half to 147 but non the less he is 147 so is That . Khan put on 8lbs which anybody can to fight Canelo at 155. At 155 Crawford gets KOed as well vs Canelo. At 160-168 it's not even a subject nor do I think anybody else thinks that. They were comparing Khan vs Canelo which took place at 155.
Comment
-
Originally posted by FRANKIE420247 View PostI read the it's perfectly fine. I still feel stylistically Crawford is a better fighter. He switches south paw beautifully, boxes and brawls when necessary. Crawford is a clean fighter that don't need carne asada in his body or questionable decisions in vegas. Canelo was a weight bully fighting Amir Khan in the first place. You also have to be logical, when even bringing up the possibility of a 147 pounder fighting a 168 pounder. There are weight classes for a reason. I see u red k me for my comment and I stick by it. Canelo and Crawford don't belong in the same discussion as far as a fight. Too big of a gap in weight. Just saying
Comment
-
-
Canelo is a middleweight period. there is no way he makes that lame 155 catchweight again. I agree with u he tops 160, he don't belong at 168. He beat the weakest link to collect a belt. When canelo fought Khan it was still a bigger man against a smaller man make no mistake. Easily a 20 pound weight difference on fight night due to rehydration. Canelo got that stocky built, same like tank Davis. Short compact dudes
Comment
-
Originally posted by NachoMan View PostI loved to watch Chino fight, but Chino on his best night gets schooled by Bud. Crawford has to be one of the most underrated guys in the sport. Only the absolute top shelf guys are go to threaten him. He handles everybody else with ease.
Comment
-
Originally posted by batista84 View PostThe problem is Canelo has never said that he is better than Oleks Usyk or better than Luis Ortiz because if he ever said that he would be crucified and would be asked to prove it fighting either of those guys, you can't be saying you are better than a fighter 3 weight classes above you, if you do then you will have to respond for your words.
Bud just shot himself, and let it be know that I got him on my top 3 P4P but he ain't Mayweather Caliber.
Comment
-
Originally posted by redmyth79 View PostNow you are the one sounding casual! Canelo at biggest is 160 not 168. He started at 147!! So your heavyweight comment is lame. Canelo is short and without reach. He carries 160 well but is a small middleweight even.
We are talking about Canelo fighting Khan at 155 1lb above the next class up from Crawford. Crawford and Khan both fought 140-147. Crawford just moved up over the last year and a half to 147 but non the less he is 147 so is That . Khan put on 8lbs which anybody can to fight Canelo at 155. At 155 Crawford gets KOed as well vs Canelo. At 160-168 it's not even a subject nor do I think anybody else thinks that. They were comparing Khan vs Canelo which took place at 155.
canelo fought at 168 so he's a 168 pounder,
Comment
-
Originally posted by HarvardBlue View PostDude, you get so emotional about Canelo it's not even funny anymore.
Your dumb ass casual fan drops boxers or think they're GARBAGE after 1 loss.... Your a waste of time. I shouldnt even of commented on.
Comment
Comment