Hopkins is chasing after the best fighters, I don't feel the same way about Floyd. Hopkins is also the type of boxer who won't ask for extra testing on fighters, because thats how confident he is at winning the fights.
B-Hop easily. He's fought & beaten more HOFmers. He has demonstrated his craft against the best fighters in each division he fought in. Floyd took the easy route too many times to be compared to B-Hop.
both are great students but definitely bhop. You know he's studied all of the greats. His knowledge of the sport is pretty amazing when he unleashes it in interviews.
He also needs to be, since he has less natural ability than floyd. He has to work that much harder (not to say floyd isn't a hard worker, just that bhop no doubt has studied the game longer and more thoroughly).
If i had to pick one to learn from though, i would pick Hopkins.
Not because he is my favourite fighter but because Hopkins style relies alot less on athleticism than Floyd and would basically be a more realistic style if you were to be a fighter yourself to learn.
People saying bhop because he's not as athletic as floyd is stupid. Both know alot, cant say because i dont know noone on this forums does so bashing either one like dick head above ^^^^^ is stupid
Comment