Of course Socialism isn't the answer. Socialism is the problem....and we're already seeing it.
Venezuela is your current day worst case scenario.
And even your best case scenario...like the Denmark's of the world, who would wanna live in a world like that? Where there is no sense of moving up the ladder and achieving because all your basic necessities are provided for. When is the last time some big invention came out of Denmark? Conditions like that make way for a world of stagnation, people being depressed because of no sense of purpose, and the pursuit of Libertine base urges [drugs, sex, and eventually suicide...the last which might be a good thing?]
And why is there this built in automatic assumption that these Robots will be built to the point that all low skilled labor will be wiped out...and then that's it. What is this, some Matrix dystopia fantasy. There is no fixed amount of labor jobs that can be wiped out. You can always do something if the cost of labor isn't artificially high through Govt inflation. Private citizens can always hire somebody as "the help". Nannies, house keeper, cook...you name it.
There is also not a fixed amount of Robots that will be built into existence and then no more. New individuals will invent/create new things and with it, new jobs and opportunities. The economy can never get that stagnant...unless you make it that way through Govt central planning, which could be in the form of some Socialism with programs keeping everyone just enough fat and happy that they don't produce anything.
Venezuela is your current day worst case scenario.
And even your best case scenario...like the Denmark's of the world, who would wanna live in a world like that? Where there is no sense of moving up the ladder and achieving because all your basic necessities are provided for. When is the last time some big invention came out of Denmark? Conditions like that make way for a world of stagnation, people being depressed because of no sense of purpose, and the pursuit of Libertine base urges [drugs, sex, and eventually suicide...the last which might be a good thing?]
And why is there this built in automatic assumption that these Robots will be built to the point that all low skilled labor will be wiped out...and then that's it. What is this, some Matrix dystopia fantasy. There is no fixed amount of labor jobs that can be wiped out. You can always do something if the cost of labor isn't artificially high through Govt inflation. Private citizens can always hire somebody as "the help". Nannies, house keeper, cook...you name it.
There is also not a fixed amount of Robots that will be built into existence and then no more. New individuals will invent/create new things and with it, new jobs and opportunities. The economy can never get that stagnant...unless you make it that way through Govt central planning, which could be in the form of some Socialism with programs keeping everyone just enough fat and happy that they don't produce anything.
Comment