True or not its dammed interesting.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Was Atlantis real...was it found in West Africa??!
Collapse
-
Originally posted by megas30 View PostDude is correlating the evidence with how Plato described it. I bet you didn't really watched the video? I don't believe Atlantis existed, but say i am wrong and it did, this is best theory/evidence so far.
Anyway I went back over it to see if I missed anything and just found more problems. For instance, hes not measuring all the rings but rather just the ones that fit the dimensions recorded by Plato. The mountains mentioned in the video were described as being part of the Island but these mountains are clearly outside of it. If this is really a flooded island, why are only the rings elevated above the plain? If Atlantis was swallowed by both water and earth, how can there be a clear outline of the concentric moats?
Like I said, I could go on and on but you ain't even tryingLast edited by maracho; 09-18-2018, 11:05 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by maracho View PostLol you packed a lot of logical fallacies in that paragraph because you feel this African model is the only Atlantis theory worth considering .
Anyway I went back over it to see if I missed anything and just found more problems. For instance, hes not measuring all the rings but rather just the ones that fit the dimensions recorded by Plato. The mountains mentioned in the video were described as being part of the Island but these mountains are clearly outside of it. If this is really a flooded island, why are only the rings elevated above the plain? If Atlantis was swallowed by both water and earth, how can there be a clear outline of the concentric moats?
Like I said, I could go on and on but you ain't even trying
I am not here to argue with you over some mythical civilization, but you are really picking at nothing.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by megas30 View PostFirst you need to point out the logical fallacies. Second, he measured the outmost ring that any sensible person would use as the dimension. What else should be elevated since the rings were already higher than the plain to begin with? The 'concentric moats" are man made, thereofore, if over millenia, many things covered gets revealed. Look at the sphinx that was said to be under water at some point...now a splendor for all to see.
I am not here to argue with you over some mythical civilization, but you are really picking at nothing.
An Island has to be higher than plain, which would have been the sea floor.
Atlantis was said to have been covered in both water and earth yet here we see perfectly intact rings
Besides the date, Atlantis is very plausible as were so many other civilizations which had been scoffed as fable before their discoveryLast edited by maracho; 09-19-2018, 07:34 PM.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by maracho View PostThe google earth measuring stick shows he clearly didnt measure the outer most ring. In fact he skipped at least two.
An Island has to be higher than plain, which would have been the sea floor.
Atlantis was said to have been covered in both water and earth yet here we see perfectly intact rings
Besides the date, Atlantis is very plausible as were so many other civilizations which had been scoffed as fable before their discovery
Not because something was covered and hidden means it is going be that way forever.
The high rings are the islands and concentric moats are the lower lands no longer full of water.
Comment
Comment