Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Shortest Scientist vs Creationist debate ever!

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • [REAL TALK] Shortest Scientist vs Creationist debate ever!




    https://youtu.be/txzOIGulUIQ

  • #2
    We scientists already know that canyon was made fast by flood waters on par to what happened at St Helens
    Last edited by maracho; 06-20-2018, 10:58 AM.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by maracho View Post
      We scientists already know that canyon was made fast by flood waters on par to what happened at St Helens
      I agree! That post St. Helens river tore a canyon wide open.
      Just like when a dam breaks or water goes over it, rapid erosion.

      Grand Lake made the Grand Canyon, not that lil Colorado river.

      Comment


      • #4
        bump......
        Last edited by maracho; 06-20-2018, 02:51 PM.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Zaroku View Post
          I agree! That post St. Helens river tore a canyon wide open.
          Just like when a dam breaks or water goes over it, rapid erosion.

          Grand Lake made the Grand Canyon, not that lil Colorado river.
          Amen brother and here you can see some of the US mountain tops around the same time Noah landed over in Eurasia

          Comment


          • #6
            Lmao does religious folks that take bible literally believe in carbon dating?

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by B.UTLER View Post
              Lmao does religious folks that take bible literally believe in carbon dating?
              If you knew how carbon dating actually works, you’d be less foolish.

              Look at the assumptions needed to carbon date things.

              Wow, you use terms you vaguely understand, as usual.

              List the assumptions necessary for carbon dating to accurately date anything?

              Ever heard of radio polonium halos?

              Comment


              • #8
                Many rocks and fossils have been carbon dated. They can't be all wrong. Those that try to find scientific fact within a book DESIGNED to be interpreted do not understand science.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by HOUDINI563 View Post
                  Many rocks and fossils have been carbon dated. They can't be all wrong. Those that try to find scientific fact within a book DESIGNED to be interpreted do not understand science.
                  http://wtamu.edu/~cbaird/sq/mobile/2...-age-of-rocks/

                  Which fossils? How old did carbon dating indicate they were?

                  Butler does not know **** except trolling.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    I don't know how people can come to the conclusion that the earth is 6000 years old.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP