Tweet
Originally posted by DaNeutral.
View Post
-
lol............. -
I’d love to see this fight. Logic tells you that Fury’s quicker hands and feet would be too much but Kownacki has a Margarito-like style that can overcome a lot of deficiencies.Comment
-
Kownacki knows why he rejected Joshua fight. he is just not that good. He had big brawls with Martin and now Arreola.
He is fair contender with very solid resume, but nothing more. I don`t think Kownacki is world champion class.Comment
-
Cmon, Kownacki isn’t beating Fury. The man couldn’t put away a retirement eligible Areola. Kownacki is a very hittable head and Fury will be dancing circles around him.Comment
-
That isn’t a real reason for a prize fighter to reject a lucrative title shot. VADA might be a legit reason but he did not reject it because he thought Joshua was too good. That is just silly talk.Originally posted by JakeTheBoxer View PostComment
-
I am a big fan of Adam, but Fury would win rather easily. It is an exaggeration though that Fury would win all 12 rounds. No way.
As per Arreola - he fought very well agains Kownacki, with steel chin, lots of heart and good cardio.Comment
-
Tyson Fury would beat him over 12 rounds.
'I think the Chisora that Tyson Fury beat in their rematch, was a better fighter than Kownacki' I would actually like to see Chisora face Kownacki, that fight could pretty much put Chisora in championship contention.Comment
-
-
Yes it is a better match up for Chisora, in comparison to Joseph Parker 'Plus I think it would just turn out to be a way better fight due to both of their styles'.Originally posted by kiaba360 View Post
It is also a more winnable fight for Chisora.Comment
-
People can't see beyond Tyson's heritage and physique. To some he'll be a lanky, awkward gypsy and if he slips a thousand punches, he was just lucky none landed. The fact of the matter is that his skills are criminally underrated and he never gets the credit he deservesComment
Comment