Isn’t Crawford TECHNICALLY the Lineal Welterweight Champ of the World?

[aboutfkntime]

Did Industry ever acknowledge PAC as successor to Floyd’s Lineage after Bradley 3?

Well he lost to Horn. Horn lost to Crawford?

Someone funna has to see Crawford?

anything that follows the word " technically " in a sentence... is
bullshlt

anything that follows the word " technically " in a sentence... is always followed with the word "but"

[aboutfkntime]

Nope. Pac won the lineal title off Bradley 3. At that time he also says he was gunna retire. The lineal title then became vacant again. The end.

how the fk did Pac win the lineal title by beating Bradley ?

[ShaneMosleySr]

If Tyson Fury is the lineal heavyweight champion, Terence Crawford is the lineal welterweight champion.

[Sustanon]

Did Industry ever acknowledge PAC as successor to Floyd’s Lineage after Bradley 3?

Well he lost to Horn. Horn lost to Crawford?

Someone funna has to see Crawford?

PAC beat Horn
Maybe the industry thought it was an insult
they have the lineal vacant

[davefromvancouv]

No. Mayweather never stopped being lineal since the Baldomir fight and hasn't officially retired yet. Plus Pacquiao was never lineal. When he fought Bradley, Thurman was #1 and Kell Brook was #2.

[aboutfkntime]

1)

" lineal "... is bullshlt !!

it is dreadful irrelevant fanboy dribble

FACT: Crawford has to beat Spence to be the man at 147... and Spence has to beat Crawford for the same reason

FACT: Bradley was never the best fighter at welter, and neither was Pac

FACT: Pac is not the best welterweight... so, who cares ?

2)

lineage... or " undisputed "... requires a fighter to either...

a) unify all 4 official belts...
b) beat a fighter who unified all 4 belts...

and imho, you need to beat that fighter when he is still relevant... not years later, when he is no longer relevant

3)

insisting that a magazine can somehow pick 2 fighters, and appoint the winner as "lineal"... is absolute stupidity

* The Ring do not mandate, and they do not sanction... they are just another opinion... so, whofkncares?

* Pac fought Bradley in 2016... well, The Ring ranked Kell Brook the #1 welter in 2016... Pac was ranked 4th, Bradley was ranked 5th

#pleaseletthenonsensestop

[aboutfkntime]

No. Mayweather never stopped being lineal since the Baldomir fight and hasn't officially retired yet. Plus Pacquiao was never lineal. When he fought Bradley, Thurman was #1 and Kell Brook was #2.

other way around bro... but, your point is correct !!

[davefromvancouv]

other way around bro... but, your point is correct !!

Oops! Thanks...

[OCPancho]

No. Mayweather never stopped being lineal since the Baldomir fight and hasn't officially retired yet. Plus Pacquiao was never lineal. When he fought Bradley, Thurman was #1 and Kell Brook was #2.

Err, sorry. The Berto fight was his farewell fight .
And has not had a title fight since.

[davefromvancouv]

Err, sorry. The Berto fight was his farewell fight .
And has not had a title fight since.

He then fought McGregor (officially) and is still contemplating a Pacquiao rematch. I guess he doesn't like his chances right now so he's laying low...