You know, ****ing any women from other race.....

[Thraxox]

Was and had been a symbol of dominance of one group of people to the other, symbolizing through sexual domination of their female counterparts, because it embodies the manhood of the dominant group over to the other ones claiming dominance through the submissive and defenseless females of the other race. It is easy to suggest that this is indeed rooted to the evolutionary behavior of human society and its racial divide.

This is what the Jihadi Invaders took pride in back in Medieval Europe. They take pride in raping, deflowering and impregnating European Christian women, claiming that the "Child of Allah inside an infadel is victory." This had been through out history of raping and pillaging, as a symbol of dominance.

There was a lot of backlash of black dudes when a famous Black Tennis player married a white guy, calling her a coon and a traitor of once race, but are the same ones that doesn't mind a white girl with a black dude like Kim Kardashian with West because of symbolism of black dominance over whites and the same for white dominance over blacks.

Though in today's society I do not think this is embedded still in general, but BLM, the KKK they still hold that symbol of worth. Japanese people roots itself in that ideology when it is common for them to publicly shame Japanese women dating White dudes and Filipino dudes etc etc....but are content with their men dating other women of other race.

This is an outdated and outlandish ideology that should not hold any water in society. It maybe weak now through modern education but it does not die and never will be.

Idk whether this is through pride, or this is just how society build up or whether or not this is rooted in our biology but this is indeed a fact.

Thoughts on this....?

[Kosta]

Bumping this ****

[Citizen Koba]

Was and had been a symbol of dominance of one group of people to the other, symbolizing through sexual domination of their female counterparts, because it embodies the manhood of the dominant group over to the other ones claiming dominance through the submissive and defenseless females of the other race. It is easy to suggest that this is indeed rooted to the evolutionary behavior of human society and its racial divide.

This is what the Jihadi Invaders took pride in back in Medieval Europe. They take pride in raping, deflowering and impregnating European Christian women, claiming that the "Child of Allah inside an infadel is victory." This had been through out history of raping and pillaging, as a symbol of dominance.

There was a lot of backlash of black dudes when a famous Black Tennis player married a white guy, calling her a coon and a traitor of once race, but are the same ones that doesn't mind a white girl with a black dude like Kim Kardashian with West because of symbolism of black dominance over whites and the same for white dominance over blacks.

Though in today's society I do not think this is embedded still in general, but BLM, the KKK they still hold that symbol of worth. Japanese people roots itself in that ideology when it is common for them to publicly shame Japanese women dating White dudes and Filipino dudes etc etc....but are content with their men dating other women of other race.

This is an outdated and outlandish ideology that should not hold any water in society. It maybe weak now through modern education but it does not die and never will be.

Idk whether this is through pride, or this is just how society build up or whether or not this is rooted in our biology but this is indeed a fact.

Thoughts on this....?

May have made sense as long as women were treated as chattels or property (which is to an extent still enshrined in law through the institution of marriage), but in modern western society where women do in theory have the same freedoms accorded to men it makes no sense. As you point out that **** ain't necessarily gonna die easy though.

Like you say though, that ****'s as old as history - you probably heard of the Rape of The Sabines - and while humans still lived in relatively small, tight knit and ethnically distinct communities it's hard to imagine a more powerful display of dominance than the mastery of someone's genetic inheritance.

That said, from a biological standpoint the diseminantion and sharing of diverse gene pools is likely to encourage strength and adaptability, and there may be a good reason why we are attracted to the strange and exotic.

[Thraxox]

May have made sense as long as women were treated as chattels or property (which is to an extent still enshrined in law through the institution of marriage), but in modern western society where women do in theory have the same freedoms accorded to men it makes no sense. As you point out that **** ain't necessarily gonna die easy though.

Like you say though, that ****'s as old as history - you probably heard of the Rape of The Sabines - and while humans still lived in relatively small, tight knit and ethnically distinct communities it's hard to imagine a more powerful display of dominance than the mastery of someone's genetic inheritance.

That said, from a biological standpoint the diseminantion and sharing of diverse gene pools is likely to encourage strength and adaptability, and there may be a good reason why we are attracted to the strange and exotic.

It is an interesting topic to hold. Men are more likely to marry outside their race than women. White dudes with Asian women, Black dudes with white women, Asian women with white women etc. etc. There is direct correlation between Men and the rate of interracial marriage.