Tweet
Originally posted by Jc8804
View Post
-
He would be seen as a coward. The bias against him is huge by insecure Ward dick suckers. -
Three is too many, in my opinion. One or two would be fine, but a third one would be pushing itComment
-
It'd have more to do with him needing exposure for the PPV than him moving up in weight.
By then he'd have 4 fights at 175 under his belt in under 2 years...so yea...
They're gonna make the fight PPV and they're gonna need to ramp it up/build it up as soon and as much as possible.
three will probably include the PPV and 2 before the fallComment
-
He gets called a coward for fighting in another division. Now just imagine if he fought in the same division as Ward? That would be insane. Those same Ward fans calling him a coward are the same fans that ride Floyd's jock. It took Floyd how many years to fight Pac?Originally posted by Jc8804 View PostComment
-
Sorry but who cares who he's fighting at the end of the deal. If he's going to fight 4 times within a year two of those fights need to be against top level compOriginally posted by LarryXXX View Post
Instead of:
1. Tune Up
2. Tune Up
3. Tune Up
4. Big Fight
It should be:
1. Tune Up
2.Big Fight
3. Tune Up
4. Big Fight
Ward just taking advantage of the system.Last edited by SilverMiles; 10-08-2015, 12:09 PM.Comment
-
Would be looked at like any other year in his career. Par for the course.Comment
-
2 fights wouldn't be a problem IMO.Comment
-
His whole career has been nothing but tune ups ..Comment
-
No fighter needs 3 tune ups. Honestly no fighter need tune ups at all. It's a way promoters and certain fighters milk the system and cheat the fans.
How many tune ups did Leonard need before fighting Hagler.
How many did Manny need before facing Cotto?
If you need 3 tune ups you better be fighting Jesus at the end of them all.Comment
-
who said they would not be top 10 contenders? no opponent has even been mentionedOriginally posted by SilverMiles View PostComment
Comment