The double standards of the GGG fanboys

[Fists_of_Fury]

GGG fought and beat nobody great. His only A class or above opponent gave him a draw and then a loss. GGG's resume is as bum filled as a major Liberal cities soup kitchen. Now his bunboys are asking who Charlo beat to earn a shot when he's the ****ing mandatory. Well who the **** did GGG beat to earn any title shot? The guy didn't even have a Trout level opponent on his resume... just bum after bum after bum after bum.

Anyone that boxed, jabbed, and circled GGG was a runner clown but when GGG does the same thing it's all the sudden just boxing. Then they get butthurt when you call their hero a running clown. Sorry but turnabout is fair game bunboys.

They hold Canelo and his teams words against them on how they will fight but not GGG's. GGG promised big drama show and Mexican style but instead chose to backpedal the whole fight and jab. He never went for a knockout and was scared to death of Mexican style since it wasn't his usual bum fighting him. He let a career 154lber walk him down .

They talk **** about Hopkins resume but Hopkins resume destroys GGG's with ease. A win over Trinidad alone ****s all over the bum filled resume of GGG. Hopkins also defended a real belt. Not some paper regular belt when the real champ is the super of that organization.

They clown Crawford's spot on the p4p list for bum fighting but had 0 problems with GGG having an even worse resume while supposedly a top p4p fighter.

They wanted smaller fighters to move up to 160lbs to fight GGG but didn't want GGG to move up. They called for old Floyd to move up and fight GGG but Andre Ward was too much of an ask for even after the 154-168lbs. talk.

If you have more double standards and hypocrisy of this delusional fanbase please list them below.

[Fangedgrowl]

GGG fought and beat nobody great. His only A class or above opponent gave him a draw and then a loss. GGG's resume is as bum filled as a major Liberal cities soup kitchen. Now his bunboys are asking who Charlo beat to earn a shot when he's the ****ing mandatory. Well who the **** did GGG beat to earn any title shot? The guy didn't even have a Trout level opponent on his resume... just bum after bum after bum after bum.

Anyone that boxed, jabbed, and circled GGG was a runner clown but when GGG does the same thing it's all the sudden just boxing. Then they get butthurt when you call their hero a running clown. Sorry but turnabout is fair game bunboys.

They hold Canelo and his teams words against them on how they will fight but not GGG's. GGG promised big drama show and Mexican style but instead chose to backpedal the whole fight and jab. He never went for a knockout and was scared to death of Mexican style since it wasn't his usual bum fighting him. He let a career 154lber walk him down .

They talk **** about Hopkins resume but Hopkins resume destroyes GGG's with ease. A win over Trinidad alone ****s all over the bum filled resume of GGG. Hopkins also defended a real belt. Not some paper regular belt when the real champ is the super of that organization.

They clown Crawford's spot on the p4p list for bum fighting but had 0 problems with GGG having an even worse resume while supposedly a top p4p fighter.

They wanted smaller fighters to move up to 160lbs to fight GGG but didn't want GGG to move up. They called for old Floyd to move up and fight GGG but Andre Ward was too much of an ask for even after the 154-168lbs. talk.

If you have more double standards and hypocrisy of this delusional fanbase please list them below.

Dude seriously. Talk boxing. You make alot of good points in your post , but you always bring up GGG. He is not fighting for awhile. Lets Talk your opinions on Wilder-Fury or Is spence gonna fight Garcia. Common Man.

[UNBIASED BOXING]

They clown Crawford's spot on the p4p list for bum fighting but had 0 problems with GGG having an even worse resume while supposedly a top p4p fighter.

This is nonsense. I have Crawford at #1-2. You're just projecting your bias on a fighter you regularly post negative remarks about, trying to attribute anything bad that you can on him.

They hold Canelo and his teams words against them on how they will fight but not GGG's. GGG promised big drama show and Mexican style but instead chose to backpedal the whole fight and jab. He never went for a knockout and was scared to death of Mexican style since it wasn't his usual bum fighting him. He let a career 154lber walk him down .

See, point proven. Talking smack and acting like the fanbase you're against is the only one at fault. First of all he was engaged with Canelo in the middle of the ring the majority of the fight. Probably didn't even touch the ropes much if any, even compared to Canelo.

And Canelo isn't a career 154 lber. He was fighting at 155 since he was like, what, 23 years old? The irony here is he's had just about as much fights above 154 than he's had at 154 in general. Dumb remark, acting like people don't mature and fill out more the older they get.

They wanted smaller fighters to move up to 160lbs to fight GGG but didn't want GGG to move up. They called for old Floyd to move up and fight GGG but Andre Ward was too much of an ask for even after the 154-168lbs. talk.

Name someone besides Floyd. Canelo was already fighting at 155. You would have crucified Golovkin if he ever fought at 161 (wait, you already are). Again, you choose to ignore the context. Golovkin was signed to fight Lemieux for a P4P, and was the mandatory for Cotto/Canelo. Ward had already fought Paul Smith @ 172? and was lining up his next fight (while sending a 50/50 contract...).

If you have more double standards and hypocrisy of this delusional fanbase please list them below.

The irony here. You're just as worst as the posters that do this (because you do it as well). You're a huge hypocrite as well, and just as delusional.

[uppercut510]

Tell em how u feel bro, but to be honest there is alot of truth in this post.

[mcdonalds]

[Fists_of_Fury]

And Canelo isn't a career 154 lber. He was fighting at 155 since he was like, what, 23 years old? The irony here is he's had just about as much fights above 154 than he's had at 154 in general.

You prove how dumb you are with ease. Use boxrec . You dksab for sure. At 23, Canelo was fighting Trout and Mayweather for 154lb titles. Canelo made his career at 154lbs. You can't spin facts and it's hilarious watching you try. Canelo had more fights, as of right now, at 154lbs compared to above. Again boxrec

It's so fun seeing the butthurt bunboys get so emotional. They have tools like boxrec but would rather be a tool themselves instead.

[Mr. 29K]

Beautiful post.

Can't stand these new tards. Why can't they just go away? King Canelo already whooped that ass, so they should leave now.

[iamboxing]

He never went for a knockout and was scared to death of Mexican style since it wasn't his usual bum fighting him

He couldn't KO Canelo because:

1. Canelo made him miss
2. Canelo has a granite chin

You said you don't like when people clown Crawford for being on the P4P list and fighting bums. So, let me get this straight...we shouldn't be clowning on Crawford for fighting bums but let's call every opponent GGG has ever faced a bum? And you talk about double standards?

Let's be frank, you don't like Golovkin because he's white and you can just about tolerate Canelo because he's marginally less white than Golovkin and made your lord and saviour Mayweather look good, but not enough to give him credit for being tough enough to take what Golovkin dished out. No, that would mean admitting he beat a good opponent, a good white opponent to be precise.

I like Mayweather and Crawford, and think Canelo beat Golovkin and left no doubts, but as soon as you said Golovkin was running you lost all credibility.

[Fangedgrowl]

He couldn't KO Canelo because:

1. Canelo made him miss
2. Canelo has a granite chin

You said you don't like when people clown Crawford for being on the P4P list and fighting bums. So, let me get this straight...we shouldn't be clowning on Crawford for fighting bums but let's call every opponent GGG has ever faced a bum? And you talk about double standards?

Let's be frank, you don't like Golovkin because he's white and you can just about tolerate Canelo because he's marginally less white than Golovkin and made your lord and saviour Mayweather look good, but not enough to give him credit for being tough enough to take what Golovkin dished out. No, that would mean admitting he beat a good opponent, a white opponent to be precise.

I like Mayweather and Crawford, and think Canelo beat Golovkin and left no doubts, but as soon as you said Golovkin was running you lost all credibility.

Wow! Truth be told. Some folks cant handle that. Good post. GGG didnt run like some idiots on here say. Great fight he lost very close decision and should get credit. You are right when is Crawford going to fight a real contender?

[Clegg]

I like GGG but this was pretty funny. I agree with some of your post disagree on other parts but just on the Charlo situation, I'm happy for him if he gets the shot.

Charlo fought who the WBC wanted him to, the fact they weren't top fighters isn't his fault, a lot of good fighters earn mandatory shots that way. He's in his prime, looking impressive and can't be expected to wait forever. If Canelo is fighting in Dec and May then one of those shots should go to Charlo.

Problem is there is always spin. If people want Golovkin getting a 3rd fight you can say "not fair on Charlo, double standards" like you're doing with this thread. But if Golovkin fans say Charlo should get the next shot you can say "see, you know he lost to Canelo twice, now you're scared of a 3rd fight and want Charlo and Canelo against each other so Golovkin can avoid both!"