I'm amazed we can't get a simple thread with people answering a simple question with their opinion as opposed to saying some troll **** or coming at someone else's favorite fighter indirectly in some random off topic way.
Lol actually this is nsb forums I'm lying my a*s off I'm not surprised.
To answer the question: Fighter B wins the round on paper. But this isn't how boxing is judged.
If Fighter A clearly controlled the round using ring generalship, landing clean jabs, and landing two SIGNIFICANT eye-catching power punches as opposed to Fighter B's 11 either partially blocked or arm punch power shots or just threw so many power punches that 11 of them got in not too cleanly I mean Fighter A can make a case and possibly win the round on some judges scorecards. There's more to winning than just punches you landed vs. punches that were landed on you.
The fighter's job is to convince the judges he won the round, not compubox. There's ways to do that without landing more punches than your opponent. It takes elite skill.
Lol actually this is nsb forums I'm lying my a*s off I'm not surprised.
To answer the question: Fighter B wins the round on paper. But this isn't how boxing is judged.
If Fighter A clearly controlled the round using ring generalship, landing clean jabs, and landing two SIGNIFICANT eye-catching power punches as opposed to Fighter B's 11 either partially blocked or arm punch power shots or just threw so many power punches that 11 of them got in not too cleanly I mean Fighter A can make a case and possibly win the round on some judges scorecards. There's more to winning than just punches you landed vs. punches that were landed on you.
The fighter's job is to convince the judges he won the round, not compubox. There's ways to do that without landing more punches than your opponent. It takes elite skill.
Comment