Originally posted by Redd Foxx
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Stephen a Smith calls robbery
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Isaac Clarke View PostHe had the fight even with the KD being the difference but called it a robbery.
I had Kovalev winning 5 of first 6 rds, then Ward winning 5 of last 6. Kovalev's edge comes from that second round knockdown. Period
— Stephen A Smith (@stephenasmith) November 20, 2016
Comment
-
Originally posted by Come on Man... View PostContradictory, how the hell can a close fight be a robbery? His boxing knowledge is limited @ best.
Comment
-
I don't think it's a robbery per se, robberies are Chavez getting a draw against Pernell Whitaker for example, but I really don't see how anyone (Judges included) can only score 5 rounds to Kovalev... he won minimum 4 out of the first 6 rounds (I gave him 5 rounds), then he won maybe another 2 (Minimum)out of the last 6 rounds...
Comment
-
Originally posted by KLockard23 View PostThe two aren't mutually exclusive. Something can be close but still be a clear victory for someone if you actually pay close enough attention to the fight and score it properly. Also, Stephen A. Smith knows plenty about boxing if you actually listen to him talk about it enough.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Come on Man... View PostA clear victory isn't close. This isn't basketball were talking here, boxing is subjective. A close fight can go either way so how can that equate to a robbery? An example of a robbery to me was Lara vs Williams.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Redd Foxx View PostWhen you're using SAS to justify your position, that means you lost the argument.
Comment
Comment